I think part of MR role is to manage the players and any suitable news
Don't understand your second point - 95% of the comments on here are speculation?
I suggest there is no comment on the Times article as SISU did not initiate it?
It's an old reporters trick - issue a spurious report to get a reaction that only leads to more spurious questioning
But you need to get at least 75% approval
Might flush out the large investors tho ? 🤔
That sounds like the Trustees thinking
They need a Receiver to really manage the debt and asset
I would need to reread the prospectus but I don't think the bondholders as a class have a way to directly do what you suggest. There is convoluted route to follow.