Search results

Technically SISU hasn't broken any conditions on this occasion.

I will not turn my back on OUR club. x1 ST for me.

Why give Wasps what they want, they said to CCFC that they would talk on the basis of there being no court action. The complaint to the EC isn't technically court action, so maybe they should swallow the pill and get around the table themselves instead of using the Ricoh discussions as a...

No words, just anger. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CCFC statement; Coventry City Football Club has no comment to make at this time regarding media reports overnight. Talks continue with Wasps Holdings Limited regarding extending our tenancy at the Ricoh Arena

It could take an undefined length of time for the EC to come to a decision.

SISU don't need to distress the insects, they're in a bad position as it is. Can't afford to make any new signings ahead of the new Premiership season. Can't pay off the Ricoh. Millions in debt. I would go mental, you're right, only for the reason that we are putting a London franchise ahead...

As a fan of Coventry City I don't want a long-term rent deal at the Ricoh. I'd consider a joint ownership with the insects, but playing second fiddle to Wasps is not even remotely appealing.

It's targeted at CJ because of his position in the Sky Blue Trust, which as we know is the biggest Supporters Trust for Coventry City FC and has all the fans thoughts at heart. [insert sarcasm meme here]

I've just seen that it's laughable that he is using Sky to emphasise his point. What he hasn't realised that Sky said last month that it was only going to be a 1-year deal at the Ricoh, now they're reporting that we are blocked on a 2-year deal, so in reality they don't know anything more than...

If the talks had stopped then none of the parties would be legally bound by the NDA not to answer Gilbert’s question. I don’t trust this information from Gilbert. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Simon Gilbert @ 6:57; Still no response from Sisu. CCFC, Wasps and the council have all said they won't comment today. No comment from any party, this is all scaremongering. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think until it's confirmed by the Club people should remain calm, this tweet from Gilbert could be inaccurate.

The rules on taking a case to Luxembourg, I'd be shocked if this turned out to be true; The European Court of Justice has its own rules on the referral of cases. As a general rule, only Member States, the institutions of the European Union and national courts can refer cases to the Court of...

This is the correct decision. Brighton spent £31.3m in the summer (according to Sky Sports) on transfers, but beyond that it's progression - Brighton haven't showed any. Each promoted club from the Championship is looking to survive in their first season and then build, something Brighton...

I personally won't read anything into it at the moment Dom, the reality is we could still end up elsewhere, the longer this continues to drag out the more people will believe that is going to be case.

That isn't any more or less information that we already know, I'd like to hope that this suggests something positive for our future at the Ricoh, but until it's confirmed through official channels I won't believe it.

I agree with you BD, take Wasps away from the thinking and the Vodafone deal will be very good for the Ricoh, fans and businesses locally.

I would say based on historical points of reference we haven't seen the end of legal action, but I don't think anything will happen until discussions between Wasps and CCFC find their conclusion.

They (David Rubin & Partners) appear to be trusted in handling administration cases for professional Football clubs, which is promising for Bolton at least. Hopefully they get the best outcome possible, but a part of me remains sceptical seeing Paul Appleton's name associated with the case.