Search results

I'm not dreaming. He literally did let rioters, who were involved breaking into the seat of government resulting in someone dying, out of prison.

And I'm just pointing out that that's redistribution of wealth. You know, the thing capitalism doesn't want unless it's to them.

What like those that turned violent trying to overturn a legal election that saw someone get killed? Oh no, wait. He let them out didn't he.

I think it's the announcement of the new Materchef host and the claim (possibly by Grendel) that the showed made the BBC billions a year. EDIT: https://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/masterchef-gets-cooked.170456/#post-3419287

Well because a redistribution of wealth does not mean an equal redistribution. It means a fair and equitable one. Those that work hard deserve more than those that do not. Those that have jobs that require specialist skills or knowledge deserve more than those that do not. Those that work in...

Bloody illegal immigrants taking all the housing!

Who's saying they should give all the money up? What is being asked is for a fairer allocation of that wealth. And that doesn't mean everyone gets the same. It means recognising the value that everyone brings. Hard work should see you get more. Can anyone work hard enough to say they deserve...

Well in some ways it is. Bezos is renowned for paying poor wages and having poor working conditions and restricting access to things like unions. Others, such as Uber etc, are even worse basically proving zero hours contracts or treating you as self employed so you have to buy all the equipment...

And who's paying for that free childcare? It ain't actually free. Someone somewhere is getting taxed and redistributing the wealth to you. Nice to see you agree with socialist principles rather than if you chose to have kids so you should pay for it yourself.

Saw that Four Pounds Avenue has flags on the lamposts earlier today.

It may well be you've become more right wing as you've got older - it is apparently something that happens a lot. I think it's to do with not being able to adapt to change as easily as you get older, so parties that appear to want to maintain the status quo become more appealing. And it's the...

Why? Given her previous stance on such discrepancies she had no other real option but to go. I think she'll be back at some point in the future though.

I'd argue neither could Sheaf. He takes far toolong to assess his options and move the ball on. Plus he's far more prone to get caught in possession or play a stray pass.

Sheaf is different to Grimes as well - you're never going to get exactly the same player. Eccles could fill in as a 6 or an 8.

Your arse must sting all weekend!

Results disagree.

Who played in the last U21 match

We don't need to - we've got Eccles.

Our fourth choice CM who would only play if we got two injuries to players in a single position has well over 150 games under his belt at Championship level. I don't call that paper thin. Sub-optimal maybe, but not paper thin.