Search results

Typo 113 million So yes 60 million would be a bargain

As I say those who struggle to argue with the point turn to wum comments. The Ricoh cost 130 million to build. So 60 million for it would be a bargain.

Moff I applaud you for attempting reasoned debate. Rather than, wum, attention seeker and absolute bollox, when faced points that are bloody hard to disagree with.

The figures were as I thought you may realise hypothetical. If the council did not do the deal with Wasps on the basis that SISU 'may' against everything they are saying change their minds and buy ACL. They go ahead as they maintain and build a stadium outside Coventry. People have said that...

I meant CCFC and wasps not the rugby club

I was always adamant the charity should not get ripped off. I they personally agree to a deal that's fine. They agreed to it. SISU said they are worth nothing but would give them 2 million because they are a charity. Now the are getting 3/4 of a million more.

Agree with that

No really a constructive point. Please explain the majority of people's reaction if SISU build a new stadium as promised outside Coventry. After the council reject Wasps. Some smart arse does the figures and saying no to Wasps cost the city...... So many millions say 10 million per year in...

That's my point Ian I am not happy this happened but I can understand the councils decision. As much as it hurts me it is a no brainer. SISU's decision to not do what Wasps did I will never understand. Unless they simply don't have the money. If that's the case where do we stand with the new...

I am not happy with it, I just completely understand why the council did it. No Coventry City Fan should be happy with it. However every Coventry City should understand that the council had no choice and the real solution was our owners behaved like normal businessmen like wasps did.

I know what you are saying and in a perfect world you are right. On the flip side how would wasps react that? We are just going to ask the football club who said they don't want to buy if they will match your offer? If they do we will Dutch you. Then the council must again negotiate with...

Another well put argument. Well done

I was under the impression you were one who maintain there is no one else but SISU and we are stuck with them for a long time?

Otis you have made fair comments about this all along. I do not include you in the bleating camp. However after a weeks delay I feel we would end up with the same conclusion, its really a no brainier unless people who say they don't wont to buy ACL suddenly matched the offer. Joy's response was...

Totally relevant

Only an idiot would not have taken the wasps deal on the hope SISU are bluffing and would buy ACL when everything they have done so far suggests they wouldn't

Yes those and the decision the councillors were faced with. The fact the charity will now get 2.77 million. The fact our owners said they didn't want to buy ACL The fact they said they are building a new stadium elsewhere. The flack you would give the council in 5 years time if SISU built...

It obvious you can't answer the well made points

CCFC will then get access to the revenue from the Ricoh and stay there. The new stadium idea would be the end of us financially. It is completely unviable

The charity have always said they were never intended to be long term owners