Search results

You're odd.

I don't think there's any question that some people would be put off by playing for an uncertain club in what's a foreign ground in front of a small fanbase. Of course it won't be the definite reason we don't sign every player available either.

o2 called my bluff massively last time out, but I did manage to knock my car insurance down to an all-time low this year so I might be battle-hardened now.

all work and no play makes savosdad something something all work and no play makes savosdad something something all work and no play makes savosdad something something all work and noplay makes savosdad something something all work and no play makes savodsad something something

I was burnt when I bought that record years ago and received absolutely no free Nelson Mandelas.

You know the things with words that aren't the thread title? They're posts where people explain their disagreements. To save you too much work, I'll exclusively reveal there aren't too many people saying that Sisu are actually fantastic. Amazing!

Nobody's stupid enough to think that a thread is merely a title and 'AGREE YES NO'

If someone made a thread about how great Sisu are but titled it 'puppies should not be killed' you'd be lost.

RFC is a gimmick, but all he's done here is say 'well done Callum Wilson' surely, so I'm not sure there's cause to jump on his back this particular time.

I went with Yes, but it's not so much believing we will as disbelieving in anything else. We have to really somehow, don't we?

Well yeah, I'm not stopping you or even trying to.

They're part of the machine itself so I wouldn't really count them as you can basically just fob off anything they say right off the bat. Segregating people into little groups is what cements divides, and it happens far too frequently here.

Except the thread is clearly more than just the title isn't it? It has other words and everything.

I wasn't talking about finances, I'm questioning whether the people you're rallying against actually exist. The closest thing I can see to anyone being pro-sisu is RFC, and that's a troll account about as subtle as diarrhoea in a crowded lift.

Then why ask 'but you are saying we are better off financially at sixfields?' which is apparently the party line of people who believe it was right to swan off to Northampton?

What the fuck? No, I'm not one of the people you claim are pro-sisu and wanted to leave. I'm not sure anyone actually is.

It's not really a question though is it? The implication is clear - if someone doesn't join in with every dissenting voice, they're implied to be pro-sisu usual suspects suxfield lovers. Let's light the pitchforks and go drown some witches.

That's just some kind of flimsy attempt at a silver lining with nothing about rent or finances though. If whoever came up with it was calling for us to leave because of the nasty boo boo men over a year ago, sure.

Is this really the logic of a forum held up as an intellectual powerhouse only this morning?