Search results

Half the value of the lease doesn’t come close to providing enough security for the amount they owe on the bonds. Even if you take the valuation from their last accounts which struck me as very high.

How can Wasps use the lease as security for the bond issue if 50% is owned by someone else.

That makes no sense. Kicked us out doesn’t stop the legals so the risk to Wasps doesn’t decrease. In fact you could claim he was failed to act in the best interests of the business by turning a significant client away.

The lack of follow up questions is so frustrating. I’m not a trained journalist but I can think of several questions off the top of my head: What valuation would be the basis for negotiations; Would the buyer take on 50% of the bond liability; Why now, are Wasps in financial difficulties; Has...

Some of the things he was tweeting at the time he was pushed out hinted it wasn’t entirely unrelated to questioning the council.

That’s correct. Another condition was to be given access to the same information that had already been supplied to Wasps to verify the business was as healthy as was being claimed. I would suggest that’s not an unreasonable request. Shame the media never press him on these conditions and just...

Would expect nothing more from TalkSport. They're not bothered with anything outside the Prem and aren't going to know the ins and outs of our situation. CWR on the other hand should be able to challenge on the relevant points but seem happy to give an easy ride.

Hopefully, unlike PWKH, they will be challenged on their answers and lack of consistency.

Because its been made up by Fisher to suit his statements at the time of no option but the Ricoh.

There seemed to be a lot of people assuming they wouldn't file accounts and therefore the club would have an embargo and that a groundshare would be a no go with the EFL. Accounts filed and signs a groundshare is already being discussed. Maybe their constant claims they don't need the club are...

Does this indicate a slight softening of Wasps stance? They've refused to meet the club, refused Coventry Cathedrals mediation offer but have said yes to this.

Joy for a new handbag.

Not even scheduled yet is it?

Click here to view the Coventry City Football Club (Otium Enterainment Group Limited) Accounts.

There was a reason for that. An agreement had been made with Wasps which was due to be signed and announced before Xmas. Wasps then backed out and took the deal off the table. Was reported on CWR.

Capacity isn't really an issue as long as there's room for temporary stands. You can build pretty much an entire temporary stadium if you've got the room. AMI Stadium in New Zealand is 100% temporary and was built from nothing in 80 days. Holds 18K upgradable to 26K for bigger games.

Depends who the owners are. What if it was a consortium of local businessmen and someone who just happened to own a ground.

That's absolutely correct. There is an assumption that losing our place in the league would mean SISU throw in the towel. Just as much chance we end up in the national league groundsharing in Nuneaton with Fisher still here.

All too common yet funding for mental health is being cut all over the place.

The EFL have said they are in constant contact with the club. I'd be surprised if the club didn't know about that letter well in advance. Tomorrow deadline is nothing really. Just means the vote will be scheduled so in reality we have until the day of the vote to sort something. Even then it...