Search results

Well that goes without saying they are never allowed to say anything positive about the council or wasps. Win, lose or draw it leads to hysteria on here.

Yes I agree with that. He needs a pre season with us to decide if it is just fitness that is causing the errors or ability. However he should not be first choice right now

Don't worry it can't last Grendel said he is shit so he must be

Tells me all I need to know about your football knowledge

Well I suppose the CET have their freedom of speech back today.

Never know as much as you Stu that's impossible. Stokes isn't good enough simple as that. Which is why TM was trying to sign Ricketts. He had to turn to Stokes when that did not work out.

A bit like you were when it came to talking about him after Tuesday

Yes that useless TM will take him off now for Jackson. He must do if he is that useless ......

There is the odd self loathing fuckwit. Generally though considering what our club has been through our support is pretty damn impressive

The irony

Stokes is peeing me off with all these cheap free kicks he keeps unnecessarily conceding

I'm quoting the BBC

The headline was directly in the content

The bbc seem to use him as their main go to man when football finance is discussed. He seems very well respected

Because this is the line he said about that note the "maybe and the "but" “If the team gets back into the Championship, maybe then they should look at building a new stadium, but what they have got seems like a pretty good deal to me." This is the other line he said Coventry City owners’...

They might know the rule now. They can only ask experts about our situation when we lose

Simon Gilbert should only report stuff like this when we lose. Also he should not ask a football finance professor to give his expert opinion on whether it is wise for us to build a new stadium. Especially when a lot of Coventry fans and his readers are asking that very same question. If the...

There is the crux of the matter. 18 months down the line and no one can explain how this deal is financially viable. We need to know the projections, in terms of what revenue is it estimated to bring in. What will this be offset by in terms of additional costs that we currently do not pay and...

I think the point is generically a new stadium makes sense. However when you relate it to us in our current situation it is crazy.

What's the deal we will have in the championship that will leave us at the bottom end in terms of revenue? What interest will we be paying if we build a new stadium, on top of the current 1.5-2 million we pay for a 9 million loan. The i tests comes off our revenue for FFP in the championship.