Search results

Burge is a good keeper. However I would get someone experienced in and loan Burge to league 4 for a season with a recall option. Murphy is on trial at Bradford. Unfortunately it has already been shown that we can't compete with them.

If we signed Reda I would have three at the back and get Phillips and Haynes to attack attack attack. I assume will sign a decent striker and if we signed some wingers I would go to 4-4-2. On another point a bradford fan asked me today if Murphy was any good as they have in on trial. He was...

...................Burge.................. Phillips...Willis...Ricketts...Haynes ..................VinceLot................... ..........JOB.................Fleck....... ..................Maddison............... ............Tudguy......Thomas

Point number 9 worth a read http://www.publiclawproject.org.uk/data/resources/116/PLP_2006_Remedies_In_JR.pdf

Good post from a man proud of his own City including its football club

The name Gregogee popped up on another thread posting some docs. However it shows him as having no posting history. So he is getting called a plant by conspiracy theorist king Grendel.

Labowitch........ Bloody hell SISU certainly knew how to employ them

Even if a judge in the future found in SISU's favour. If the judge felt that SISU's own behaviour contributed in anyway to creating the situation. The judge does not have to provide any remedy.

I am split minded on him. I think he has a bad attitude. His piss taking about getting pulled over turning up to training dehydrated. Also the suggestion he was laughing and joking after defeats. His appalling injury record. The fact he is holding out as long as possible in case...

It's the same user name of someone who did post on here a lot

He said in a debate with me in this forum.

To be fair Nick has stated he does really care much about Coventry as a City. Just the football club. I know where you are coming from Simon and the Telegraph does represent the views of the majority of Coventry folk. Who are passionate about both their city and their football club

I get the argument. However SISU requested two remedies. 1) compensation 2) Wasos pay a commercial rate SISU did not need to request the second remedy. They only needed to request the 1st remedy. The second remedy benefits the council. We all know SISU's opinion of the council. The...

In addition to asking for compensation. What do SISU gain from asking for Wasps to be made to pay the council.

I take that as you don't know then?

Yes I understand that. If they prove it was state aid and incorrect terms. They can request compensation. What they don't have to do is additionally ask for their landlord to pay the difference. To what end?

Do you have any idea why SISU are in addition to requesting compensationthey are also asking for Wasps to pay the council more? One part of me would be pleased, I would be even more pleased if it was to pay the Higgs charity more. Shame that is not possible. However the other part of me thinks...

So you think SISU can't claim compensation from the council. If a judge rules in their favour. Unles they also ask for Wasps to pay more money to the council?

I assume it completely eliminates as an option to the judge as a remedy if the judge found in SISU's favour

Don't really get your point? Why do you think we are trying to get Wasps to pay more money to the council? Do you think such action will have any impact on the relationship between SISU and Wasps?