Search results

Perfectly put

The day they took over we were in the Championship and they came in promising the Premiership. 4th in Division three after the worse year in the club's history ( Northampton) Is not progress compared to that day.

Progress interesting definition of progress. I would say now is progress compared to the last day of last season. However The day they took over compared to today is far far far from progress.

cheers G man

I think he came and looked round the Ricoh. Said he wanted to sign but our embargo didn't get lifted and he signed elsewhere (Swindon?). I think we missed out on a few first choice options due to the delay in getting the embargo lifted.

I know we have no devine right but I feel we should be in the premiership. Get us there and I will forget. We should not be in the third division. Championship is where we were when SISU took over promising the premiership. Deliver on their promise and I wil forget.

Stu, most people said no one else would come to the Ricoh going through a list like you have above ruling each option out out. Yet it has happened. Most people said to move out of Coventry could not happen and listed numerous reasons why, It did. Wasps have done things I haven't expected...

Dave he is saying we shouldn't sign a two deal it is too short it is nothing. We need a long term deal whether it is the Ricoh or new stadium. Then he goes and signs the two year deal. If it is a new stadium the way we have gone so far it would be at least 5 years. Plus where are the answers...

The location is secondary in this. What is glaringly the issue is that in 3 years we have been shown a drawing of what a generic stadium looks like. We have two years before we are potentially homeless. The people making the decisions are getting a very easy ride from all the media outlets...

I didn't suggest these. There were on here by a few people a while ago. They seem bang on the money so far.... Just wondering if there will be any update on what else they suggested.

So , so far 1) Ricoh Extension 2) Adam Armstrong to stay Anything else??

17k and astonishment for you I think. Especially with an extended build up and no match in Saturday

Great comment all round

Sorry Dave I appreciate your reply and link. However I have already read that and FairPlay to the guys interviewing they tried their best to actually get some answers. However if you read that there is no real answer "2 years is too short we need a longer solution. " What about if...

Micky Gynn and Boatang 80's & 90's

Cyrile and Keane would have been great. 80's and 90's

As an idiot I am not sure why you are asking my opinion but here goes anyway...... Stokes last season defended better than Haynes. On the rare opportunities he has got this season Haynes has been just as good a defender as Stokes. I assume TM has sorted him out. However he has the advantage...

Bloody annoying when you only have iPads and I phones.

Wilson for me his strength was outrageous and very unexpected. Armstrong has some of that but not quite the level of Wilson.

Anyway what I am asking is actually relevant to this thread. We have signed another temporary deal at the Ricoh whilst building our new stadium. In three years we have seen a drawing. What are we going to get in two years time and what happens then? Why are CWR, CET and the observor not...