Decided to have a look, prior to Lee Glovers Arrival
W 4
D 3
L. 2
After his arrival
W 2
D 0
L 9
(Including 6-1, 6-2, 5-0, 3-0, 3-0 defeats)
Not sure losing nearly 90% of your matches is great for development.
Sorry Hobo
Agree with you on lots of things. Results are relevant at u21 level.
We are not talking 12 year olds. They are especially relevant if in the same season they have taken a dramatic downturn coinciding with a new boss.
However the results since he has been in seem to have been...
I think because we lost on Sat. I am now allowed to ask this question.
Anyone know what Glovers record is like in comparison to the games prior to his arrival.
U21's development should be very key to us these days.
He was lucky at Coventry he reaped the benefits of DMC's performances. Then got out before the effects of DMC moving on woukd be shown.
Huge difference between him and TM or me.
Facts are the facts though.
Stokes did very well during those ganes at CB.
Haynes got called steady Eddie by TM.
We then go and shake it up but leave the one player who wasn't on top of his game in.
Personally I wouldnt have changed the defence that only conceeded two goals in 270 minutes of footy. And was part of the team that scored 7 in the same time frame. Not unless I had to.
Try and be truthful with yourself for once. who has been the more consistent Phillips or Haynes.
Which is least damaging
Ricketts at RB, Stokes at CB, Haynes at LB
Or
Ricketts at CB, Stokes at LB, Phillips at RB
Something that hasn't hapoened for a Cov manager for a long long time :-
Spoilt for choice
Personally I believe lam isn't worthy of dropping other players for JOB should play more often than not.
Cole should be use for the last 30 minutes when we need to keep posesdion and kill off...
Especially considering we have already Beaton Burton at their place and were only 3 points behind them.
Some people are not happy unless they have a pop at their own fans. That's the only embarrassing thing here.