Search results

I've noticed he will no longer engage with anyone who points out factual errors.

Using the logic of the council, Wasps etc a couple of years out of the city means 100 plus years of history in the bin and we're now classed as nomadic. We should move halfway across the country permanently, sure that would be applauded.

I wonder if any Wasps supporters have actually communicated to the club in anyway that they don't support the action being taken by Wasps?

I'm sure he'll be quick to question Wasps about the fact we have seen repeated statements explicitly stating SISU offered to sign legal documents confirming no more legal action.

Bit of an odd conclusion to draw. Personally if the council and / or Wasps have done something wrong I'd want them to be punished and CCFC to return to the city but each to their own.

That's what I mean, clubs have in the past. I have a feeling we were one of the first to do so many years ago. The rules about no games on TV at 3pm on a Saturday (which isn't actually a law) were in place then so surely its possible now.

Its already better than the Ricoh!

Since when? How do other clubs manage to relay games?

They've stitched Gilbert up a treat there. Fans groups will be PSB and maybe the Trust from when they went up and gave them a round of applause. Great work from our own fans groups allowing Wasps to use them as an endorsement of their actions. Only have to get to the second line for BS. It...

Wonder if the club could put on official screenings of the ifollow feed somewhere in Coventry. Would be an option for those who genuinely can't attend to still get together, support the club and help financially.

Its Birmingham not Barcelona we're ground sharing with. For a lot of people the time difference will be negligible. If, as you suggest, people don't go as they prioritise other commitments fair enough but thats their decision. They aren't being stopped from going. One thing I would say is I...

The EC will only investigate if there is something that needs looking it to. It's not like a court case where the other side have to defend themselves. So if, and its still an if, that proceeds they think there's something worth investigating. As a local taxpayer surely thats a good thing or do...

Based on one of their old away kits. Shows that Hummell don't make you stick to a template. If Cambridge can have a custom away kit surely we can.

Another one for the Trust to push. Get a list of sponsors and contact details and encourage everyone, respectfully, to let them know they will no longer get business from our fans. Same with this, Trust should line up business after business that loses out from this to release statements...

Probably already started work on another book.

The Telegraph and CWR should be hammering this question with Wasps. If they and the council are certain they are in the right why the need for indemnification?

The replies are hilarious. Every one of them telling them he's talking shit and doesn't know what he's on about.

Only things would be indemnification, which I suppose they could do technically but would be crazy to do so, or stopping the EU complaint, which is impossible.

I'd concentrate on people that actually went to the Ricoh.

And then what? There is currently no legal action being taken by the owners so a change of ownership changes nothing. It is for the EU to decide if they will investigate, nobody else has any power to influence that.