Search results

  1. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    That would turn it from a shocking deal to a good one for me.
  2. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    What a save just saw it on Sky Sports!!!!! Top lad RCC!!!
  3. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    If we go up and Norwich go down I don't think they would let us bear him. Not if they have any sense. Could be weird seeing Maddison and Murphy line up against us next season
  4. D

    Mean while back in court

    Do you think the council knew they were doing wrong (if they have) when they did it?
  5. D

    Mean while back in court

    This second to deal do the council have anything to do with them now.
  6. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    Who has been saying Murohy is shit? Quite bizzare
  7. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    Its normally the other way round Nice for us to do it to someone else
  8. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    Thank god!!!!
  9. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    No news in ours yet? Sorry page hadn't refreshed
  10. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    FFS can't we get the two of them back together for one match Rose instead of Vince 2-1 city
  11. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    2-0 city .....,....
  12. D

    Port Vale (Away) Match Thread

    .....................RCC.................. Ricketts.Stephens..Cargill. Stokes ............,....Fleck...Vince .........JOB.....................Murphy ...................Maddison...........,,. ...................Armstrong............
  13. D

    Mean while back in court

    I agree with you, as I understand it if the claimant was found to have caused the situation that led to the public entity making an incorrect decision then damages are highly unlikely as a JR remedy. However if SISU win the JR can they not then use that in evidence to persue separate civil...
  14. D

    Mean while back in court

    I don't know what you are talking about regarding the trusts email? So I can't comment on that. I am talking about you suggesting that whatever people post is spin to make the council look good. So do you agree that if SISU win this case and the government pay out. Which doesn't directly...
  15. D

    Mean while back in court

    When I pointed out that this case just sets case law that council's cant use money in this way and that's it really. Which is something you actually agree with. As you point out it doesn't address each sides behaviour in this sorry affair ( well actually you just said it doesn't address the...
  16. D

    Mean while back in court

    That wouldn't be the case as they made the decisions that led us to division three.
  17. D

    Mean while back in court

    Is it a possibility = yes. Is it more likely to happen if they recoup their losses = yes Was that the point I was making = yes Was the point I was making that if that can happen without it affecting the people of Coventry that is my preferred option = yes Was I making that point in...
  18. D

    Mean while back in court

    Specs how have SISU been exposed exactly? Their emails are not on display at court? I think the council are getting exposed as you say and evidence wise you only really get council documents disclosed, because as you say they are a public entity. However we have not seen SISU's emails...
  19. D

    Mean while back in court

    If SISU win and the Government pay out. Does that potentially present more options to SISU or not? Yes If it does without affecting the people of Coventry is that possibly a good thing? Yes. It the above just bloody obviously? Yes if someone posts it because they have just...
Top