Search results

Doesn't very little income actually come from having 365 day incomes?

The start of the charge for 2nd

i think people have just pointed out when the conspiracy theories are getting a bit ridiculous. Like that the council or Wasps were intentionally using a time capsule to attack the club. Or using London Midland to attack the club. If CCFC do well Wasps make money so I don't think they are...

Sorry I know this won't suit the picture some would like to portray but..... I see the CET been very complimentary about the football team. I look at this site and CET for most of my football news. They cover loads on CCFC and I would guess it doesn't cost CCFC a penny. If Wasps are...

CCFC must have paid the CET more the other week. When the CET questioned the PR from London Midland as to why Wasps matches were choose for the train trial. Of course there was hell to pay on here until we realised the CET were actually defending the club. Then it was "nothing to see here"

Yes after 3/4 appeals if the council found a judge who finally agreed with them. The judge could turn round to the landlord and say the compo for this is to be paid by the Government not you.

Excellent news

Sod that, the council should demand to pay lower rent. When they get a few offers Don't agree to them. Also bid to buy the landlords business. Go on a rent strike. When legal action is taken against them. Move the Libray to Leicestershire and dare the landlord to find a new tenant or...

That table looks great now that the games in hand situation is sorted. Bradford Cov play off final is still on for me!!! But this time we will know how to handle Hanson

The likes of Southampton Swansea Leicester Norwich Bournmouth We're right to go for it when they did Once you are in now you really have made it. Even Villa know they can afford to get relegated clear the squad out and start again.

He turned down two other clubs and said yes to this one. What player wouldn't say yes. The issue was never about whether madders wanted to go or not. For me and I think for the majority who were unimpressed It was the fee. Madders would know he would be gone in the summer if it wasn't...

I think about 90 or 95% of the money stays with the clubs in and relegated from the Prem, the rest is split between everyone else. However the deal is that big thats still a lot of money.

I thought that as well. I thought this outrageous deal the premier league negotiated includes a trickle down to all teams in the championship

I will have look in a minute but I am sure someone said he said that

Would love to see oggy in the sticks!!!! What's Nicky Weaver up to these days?

A giant cat to chase away a giant wasp

The bit I am really relieved about is he said that it is not the case that this model falls down if we get to the championship. So if we can agree a long term deal at the Ricoh not only will our future be secured but we also don't have to face instant relegation or financial ruin. We will...

Must say I thought we were self sustaining without selling anyone. Selling someone would lead to money on top? I also thought the 60p in the £1.00 was in relation to FFP. That a cash injection from players dskes was exempt from that. So if we were self sustaining prior to the Maddison sale...

How good is it to be looking at these fixtures not for relegation reasons.

Why? If SISU stand in front of me and tell me things that make sense I stop asking questions. I genuinely believe JM would sell for more in the summer if 12 premiership clubs are interested in him then he will. However you can't argue with the fact if he gets a stonker of and injury...