Search results

  1. D

    Starting to smell the coffe yet?

    Still SISU as the main issue and main protagonist of this whole situation But would always vote for CCFC in the above poll.
  2. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    Always reading the telegraph never noticed the comments section underneath before. Just had a quick look!!!! That was an eye opener :woot::woot:
  3. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    People down vote PUSB Well that isn't a Cov fan surely ??
  4. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    They did do an attempt but the club wasn't for sale. Then the club bought itself out of adminstration. I would guess we wouldn't see them again unless the club is genuinely for sale or genuinely in adminstration looking for new owners.
  5. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    Definitely steering clear of that Yes you get debates here No question As it should be.
  6. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    No high horse it was a genuine question, a few people had made reference to it on here. However I haven't witnessed it here.
  7. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    Ha ha I am not going to look then This is enough for me
  8. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    But nobody knows so it's a guess.? Third party litigation only take cases they pretty much know they can win. Woukd you have assessed this one to be in that bracket?
  9. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    The new owners if there were some would only need to work with Wasps.
  10. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    Is this whooping just in the CET and Twitter I can't see any of it here
  11. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    So you have When you say as stated you mean as guessed?
  12. D

    Future of this Football club.

    Like everything you say. Accept I imagine if we did get new owners and they hadn't had years of conflict with the council and No bad history with Wasps or the Higgs Trust I guess life might be a bit easier for the football club
  13. D

    Higgs have legal clauses inserted to block CCFC and back Wasps only

    If they liquidated us They would still sell the golden share first.
  14. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    Yes you would sell out the Butts even in division 4. However if you are going to do that for 5?years why hold on to the club it is risk that could cost you money you could sell the golden share and still continue your litigation
  15. D

    The agreement for Wasps to move here / 2 years on

    I don't argue with this one it is a good point and I don't think Wasps stance re the Ricoh fits the criteria. It especially wouldn't if we asked for negotiations to restart on the proviso that if a deal is reached the litigation would be dropped.
  16. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    I assume by liquidating though the golden share would still get sold off?
  17. D

    So if this is a forced takeover...

    Back in Northampton? To sustain the model of self sufficient over there you would need to be out of the league I don't think even division 4 would cut it on those crowds
Top