Search results

Yes he can't slag him off in public if he disagrees with him.

That's why it would have to be 25k from the start before I would fully back it

Ok Grendel, whatever

To be honest I wasn't keen on the Butts due to the 25k limited capacity. However even I have changed my mind now. However I don't trust SISU so I would want it built at 25k from the off. Not start at 12k and hope they get there one day.

Yes exactly this, but relatively in the league he has gone to it will be silly money for Eastleigh.

He has said hasn't he? That he wanted to explore the possibility of doing something with CCFC. However Millerchip said no and in September they have a meeting where he finds out what Millerchip wants to do.

That's what I am saying

I have never said he was offered a contract and you haven't got a scooby about whether he was or not. Also you have no idea what he is earning at Eastleigh.

I agree SISU should be saying to Wasps if we get to the point of signing a contract we will ditch the legal action. SISU look reasonable PR battle won Negotiations re start unless Wasps are prepared to be the bad boy

Have a regard for MV's views he knows a little bit more than you. He said words to the effect of TM wants Reda but his wage demands and contract length expectations are too much.

No the odd person suggests that the council (previously) and now Wasps should let the legal stuff run. Separately they should be doing business deals with SISU and put the legal battles in a seperate box as it is not related to rent deals or stadium management company sales.

I suggest you go and have a read of the SCG thread and pay particular attention to what MV said about TM's views on Reda.

Are you suggesting that when you enter relationships and negotiations with people. That if you are not involving them directly or indirectly in expensive pointless legal battles, you may have a better chance of those negotiations and relationships going smoother?

I do sometimes wonder if you actually read this forum that you post so much on

General view? Sorry I haven't got access to that, can you show me where? Also what is the average weekly wage at that level?

TM said wage demands AND contract length. So wage demands were a factor. Eastleigh to be anywhere near what we were offering him to pay him at their level Relativity will be throwing money at him.

TM wanted to sign him but said his wage expectations was too much. So they are paying him more than we were prepared to. At that level then relatively they are throwing it at him.

Of course it's not. He was only at our level because of his injuries. We would only give him a certain wage and contract because of his injuries. Somebody way below is throwing everything at him because if he stays fit at that level he is a complete match winner

Wtf and we wanted to sign him but his wage demands were too much!!!

Your in