Search results

It's good movement and headers from Cambridge for both goals - must be difficult to defend against. We could do with a number 9 like that. The best missed chance for us looks like the Nazon one at the end - he should have done better. I hate to write it but if Jones keeps performing like that...

From what I can see we lost because we used most of chances to shoot straight at the keeper and didn't mark their striker closely enough - he moves away from his marker too easily both times. Jones was unlucky to hit the bar with a smashing shot however.

Sorry, ought to have put some kind of emojicon thingy. Was taking the piss.

The Law is just playing SISU at their own game. Allow them to appeal and spend many more £000s on legal professionals and then judge against. It's the only language Joy understands.

The first I remember was Sheff United at home. I'm pretty sure I'd been to some before and recall this game I think because I made friends with a young Blades fan and we both stood next to the steel rail on the kop. It would have been about 1970ish - Tony Currie was playing. I also remember a...

This seems pretty paltry for a player going to Man U - even if they are as yet unproven. The lowest potential value in 5 years time is 0 - the highest could easily be £30m +. 'Rising to £500k' implies that Man U will have most of their risk mitigated (if he doesn't progress they lose only the...

Really? I prefer cheddar.

He's tuning his guitar.

No way - we'd win. We batter people in appeals.

Need to start scoring more goals before we talk of promotion.

I guess the ref saw it as obstruction - but if the Vale player hadn't shifted right they wouldn't have collided.

Agreed. It looks like the guy runs into him.

Oooh, goody - this is my second favourite pointless argument that goes on and on repeating the same words ad infinitum. Can someone please write that SISU make a fortune out of the club now and I will be complete.

That's a much better point. I'm going to argue that seat belts and crash helmets don't cause the criminal behaviour that drugs do. But I accept the point.

Er no - because that harms other people doesn't it? As does criminalising drugs of course: people caught up in drug wars.

Why are more people endangered? Anyone that wants drugs can get them already. By legalising I believe that fewer will be endangered. I'm certainly not going to buy it, even if it were legal and cost 1 penny a kilo. Same for anyone else who is educated and cares about their bodies. The...

No. But it's happening anyway - there's no control. Legalise it and then you can see the people struggling and help them. When they are buying from a street corner they are away from all help.

Is that John Meadows? I work for the government and we were out to get him during that time.

I'd also legalise and tax prostitution. It's going to happen. At least provide places safe for women to work where they are protected from the nutjobs. Why force them into alleys and strangers' cars? It's madness.

I'd legalise the lot. Nothing that is of harm only to yourself should be illegal: - If you can get the drugs easily and legally it automatically stops all the crime surrounding illegal provision - If it were legal it might not feel so glamorous to kids. - Add tax. The state can then easily...