Search results

Leave a couple of players up at set pieces, our area is too crowded anyway. The opposition will have to leave 3 defenders back

I'd rather have Joan Collins and Rebel Wilson

But what I'm saying is that as far as I know no-one outside of CCFC & Sporting know the true figure we have already received that counts towards the deduction from the total which gives the remainder to base the 10% on, i.e. the figure you have quoted at 24M in post 26.

The figure Sky Sports are quoting is initially £55M (sterling). So the question is, what extra have we received on top of the original fee, and contractually, what was it for? Any amount we received for reducing the sell on percentage shouldn't be added to the original fee, that amount was I...

Rumour was, MVE turned Leeds down to come here. There are sometimes more things to consider than just expected league position come next May

I think we dodged a bullet. It's very rare a player goes on strike/refuses to honour their contract.

Even if true it will cost him less than 1M per year when you take off the tax & NI

The story is, some joker from Talk sport came out with this and then COV. Observer contacted Sporting who confirmed we were still getting 10% if a sale goes through. It seems the talk sport guy was getting mixed up with the reduction from 15% to 10% which was out of our hands.

I think the point is, we don't want to be turning things round every season.

Is Scumberland ok? What about Nottingscum Forest?

According to Kyle Bonn in post 620 it's his left foot'.

The guy standing behind looks happier than Haji. Must be her dad.

I assume he could easily change his agent if he disagrees with what's happening

Have you not read post 1471?

Corrected for you

This was Opta Supercomputer top 6 prediction for the season just finished Leeds Middlesboro Burnley West Brom Luton Norwich 2 out of 6 and only 1 correct position. Not much better than random selection. https://theanalyst.com/articles/championship-predictions-2024-25-opta

I assume that lowering the release clause wouldn't negatively affect Vik, so Sporting could lower it if they wanted, but not raise it as that could affect him. They could hint that they might lower it to get some interest, but could then raise it again up to the stated contract amount if it...

no you're not

But if Vik opts for Arsenal he is free to do that, so there is no point Atletico offering Sporting more. At that point they need to offer Vik a package that is attractive to him

Not sure how reliable this site is, but this is from September last year https://www.footballtransfers.com/en/transfer-news/uk-premier-league/2024/09/viktor-gyokeres-release-clause-bombshell-arsenal-chelsea