Search results

Oh.thats ok then

We're threadbare up front as it is,I daren't even think about Armstrong getting injured

No-Emerdale's on later

In these circumstances it's very unlikely the parent club would be impressed if their player were not even making the match day squad. Whoever they loan them to,the main objective is for them to get game time.

But the fans are just that, fans. We are not really qualified to form a considered opinion, following your football club You don't expect to be caught up in all this hi-brow legal shenanigans. All the major players in this mess should hang their heads in shame.

Last I heard of him,he was being prosecuted for blackmailing a teammate or something

I moved away from cov in 1980 aged 11 and moved to the east coast,by 1984 my parents kept a pub.Watched Coventry whenever I could but it wasn't enough ,so started going to Norwich games with two of my dad's regulars (must admit it made me feel dirty)not a great place. Crowds were regularly...

Norwich are really good at this,they don't push the boat out to far on wages,and keep a close handle on contracts. Think they are one step away from being prem regulars like Stoke,Saints,West Ham. Even relagation I don't think would set them back to far.

Sure I said that a couple of days ago.

Eh?

Yeah. We're having Chinese

Well if you concur,say no more.

Well thought out. we will see in the summer.

About those plans,someone better wake Tim from his slumber. Also: if you don't own something,but you want to use it,then you have to rent it. If we pay someone £200.000 rent why would they then pay match day costs for us

What,is it being held at Old Trafford

1.we could do without him for the rest of the season,so no need to replace,some of the money could have been used for much needed striker or winger or both. 2.This was a rushed deal,at what level do you really think MV was involved,do you think his opinion was sought and/or considered. 3.Your...

But what we were paying pre rent strikes is now irelavent isn't it. I'm no expert but £200.000 a year for Ricoh & share of F&B doesn't sound to bad

But apparently it's no good at the Ricoh,even on a low rent (200,000 per annum wasn't it) and share of f&b

You couldn't handle the truth

Aren't we all