Search results

Wasps need the money - that is why

Are those two still trying to get contracts 😂

It is not the same as having those deals over the line though and maybe having received the first instalment. Also two big wages no longer being paid out each month.

Ours arrived Tuesday.

Craig Hignett was decent on a short loan spell

And having to gel so many signings may affect their early form. We all know in the Premier League a poor start is usually disaterous. Even with parachute payments can they afford the new signings if they come straight back down? I can see Forest being the whipping boys this season.

And it's TAY-YO silver lining, anywhere you go now baby I see your sun is shining But I won't make a fuss, though it's obvious

When he broke through at Huddersfield he was considered a bit of a wonder kid until his very serious knee injury. It obviously took him a while to get his career back on track, but fair play to him - he did that at Southampton.

He is coming here to get games and he will get them I am sure. Palace obviously feel he is ready for the challenge. But for some of our fans to think he will just walk into the team first game - is just wrong. There are a lot of games over the season and they come thick and fast. I expect him...

He looked class. Played with his head up, knew where players were and was always willing to receive the ball even in tight situations. I thought we should have signed him. His subsequent career at Southampton suggests we let a very good player slip through our hands. I think there were...

Most our fans want players playing who arent in the side because they havent made mistakes. Hence the regular comment "Robins needs to make at least 4 substitutions at halftime" and he clearly didn't because we went on to win. 😁 The debate is why play and debute a 18 year old with no experience...

Ignorance, being illiterate and there pathetic mantle of "We are Millwall no-one likes us!" 😁

It could also be about managing his game time and not playing a young player into the ground - which could be detremental to his development. Also our track record of coaches working and bringing on young players would have been considered.

Well it should soon be 3 loans. What if the JCS deal was done with the anticipation of players going out of the club who haven't? Talking to the board suggests it is a budgetary issue. We also don't know what else is in the pipeline or what contingency budget there might be? It could even be...

Rotation, minutes off bench, cover for injury, competing with an experienced pro. They would probably be happy with that. Part of going on loan is experiencing and coping with a different environment. Thats why clubs rarely loan players back the following season. Going to another team...

We know the budget is tight, certainly until one or maybe two go out. So bringing anyone in that takes us over budget, even temporarily would have to be discussed and rattified regardless of their wage.

Somebody on here had a wank about him leaving and put their fantasy in writing in a post.

It Wouldn't suprise me if Burnley don't come back in for O'Hare with a couple more quid, some baccy and a lame whippet

We did. Didn't we have a mobile shop for a while too?

Didnt Robins mention expected someone inl Tuesday?