Search results

This reply suggests you think people would vote in your favour? If this is the case then you’re more deluded than I thought. Start the poll.

Imagine my shock

Well I’m unsure. I certainly did not feel happy about the ST situation initially, so concerned I have been quoted as saying I was.

LOL

This is good news. But I’m worried me saying it’s good news will prompt Grendal to accuse me of having my tongue in Kings arse.

Oh was I? Can you quote my post where I said I was happy to “nod and move” for me please?

Fantastic from Doug and club. I will remain in my seats and pay the extra instead of going to family zone, thank god.

I had a £50 side bet with a Norwich fan that we would finish above them this season, so that’s a winner. I have also placed a bet on this treble, but only £20 for me.

I will be renewing but not in my seats. I just simply can’t afford £800. I will take the plunge and sit in the family zone for £350 which really is terrific value for me and my 2 kids. I will however wait until they start to open more blocks in the North stand so we can get the best possible view.

I messaged my 13 year old earlier and told him we would be moving to the family zone behind the goal (currently sit in 20) and he responded with “I would rather sit there than not go”. I don’t think kids care where they sit.

That family zone will sell double quick. I expect that’s why they have greyed out the south stand to open that up more.

I think it’s targeted at the single adult male/females that go, I would imagine with the recent posts about defrauding the club with age range tickets, this was in mind.

I like the Premier League package, and would pay it. But it’s £500 across the board, meaning it would be £1500 per season for me and my 2 kids. I really don’t want to sit in the family stand but £1500 vs £350 is a no brainer.

Ok so do you not like Boddy because he is incompetent at his job? Or because he won’t engage in your sponsorship requests?

Yea I’d still take him, but not with Hamer replacement in mind. Hamer recently has been pushed on a little, leaving Eccles and Sheaf/Kelly holding. I would play Patino in that deeper role with licence to dictate from a little further back. Hamer is more all action which Patino isn’t.

Totally different player.

Point. Made.

Jesus this forum is infuriating. Virtually every post is Grendal and Boosh just arguing everything anyone posts. Can’t you both just text each other your ridiculous opinions and leave the rest of us to it? It’s so boring.

I voted Hamer. I just enjoy watching him play more than I do Vik. Both exceptional in this league though.