Search results

A big red flag for more with the security has always been who they were going to sell the lease for at anything like the amount its been valued at.

The way security was written about in the prospectus always seemed a bit off to me but I assumed it was just going over my head and as I wasn't about to hand them thousands of my own money not an issue. How would it work in practice? Wasps say we're going to offer you 20p in the £, to pick a...

How would administration or CVA work with the bond? If they just turn round to bondholders and say, for example, we'll give you 50p in the £ why would they accept when they have security? Unless there's not enough security to cover the bonds you're not accepting less are you?

unchanged team :D

Not sure I'd be rushing to bring anyone on at half time that we'd miss if they got injured. Why take the risk, we're not coming back in this game

concentrating on the league

Think they do it, or did in the past at Wembley. Of course the FA will throw money at Wembley which is a significant difference.

Going back to the pitch issue its very quiet from Wasps. Apart from their toys out the pram statement there's been nothing on how they plan to address the issue. How do drop in pitches work, if a new pitch is prepared elsewhere how long does the CBS need to be out of action for it to be...

Reeves is getting the cheque book out as we speak

I would imagine that as with our administration they've got everything lined up so they can control the process and get the outcome they desire. The bond holders are potentially the issue, can't see that they'll just accept a part payment when they have the security of the stadium, well lease...

Is he using the Tim Fisher 'normal business practice' line

Even if league games had been scheduled to be away there would still be a home cup game to be played tonight. For me there are questions around the maintenance of the pitch and the state it was in prior to the CWG. If they knew a new pitch wasn't going in then getting the existing one right...

not a deterrent at all is it. fair play to the security guy, not sure I'd be stepping into the middle of that

Took a quick look on their forum, I know we have some odd people on here and some posts leave you scratching your head wondering what you've just read but they are on another level. They've unquestioningly accepted Vaughns statement and as far as they're concerned that's now the end of it...

I think the EFL primacy regulations also require the club to have the ability to cancel other events at the arena.

This is nice and vague, how many? Tomorrow is a home draw in the cup, not a league game. And if they knew it wouldn't be playable why did they not insist it couldn't be used. To me its pretty simple, if you hire a football stadium to stage a championship football match the absolutely minimum...

Do you really think that if the pitch wasn't safe to play on Sunday it was a good idea to, instead of putting a plan in place to stage the game elsewhere, just cross our fingers and hope it miraculously sorted itself by tomorrow? You'd have been the first one complaining about Boddy if there had...

Not sure relaying the pitch is the major issue here. There was a promised increased spend on pitch maintenance and we’ve had to cancel our first home game. Do we really think the ref inspecting the pitch cares if it’s a new pitch or not. The only thing of importance is it was deemed dangerous...

When Bobby Bridge is writing articles like this you know things are badly wrong https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/rugby/wasps-fans-claim-theyre-left-24712607

You can see the ref saying one for the push one for dissent. Are they now saying Flanagan's push shouldn't have been a yellow? I didn't know you could appeal yellows tbh.