Search results

It all depends on the Judges decision. But I must point out that on the State Aid guidance and on there flow chart, the clearly states the importance of notifying the EC if there is any State Aid above 200,000 Euro's, which this was.

It all depends on the Judges decision. But I must point out that on the State Aid guidance and on there flow chart, the clearly states the importance of notifying the EC if there is any State Aid above 200,000 Euro's, which this was.

TBF I see my ex wife in her too.. pretends to be an angel but under that cloak is the devil.

Who is that hot chick on your Avatar.. your mum???:whistle:

Quote-: Sisu QC says European Commission should have been notified. This I feel is what is going to be the Achilles' heel for the CCC. If CCC did not notify the European commission regarding the State Aid (if it is classed as one) then they have been very amateurish and stupid. I do fear this...

Thanks

Maybe we wouldn't if SISU had negotiated in a civilised manner don't you think. Daniel Levy has managed it and so have other club owners.

What has really annoyed me since this hearing started yesterday is that SISU in some way have admitted that the Stadium was it's prime interest and the football club was just gun fodder for them to use against ACL. I honestly starting to wonder whether the relegation to league one was...

We are coming home.. they building a stadium are they not???

I know they haven't but just asking will there be.

Any smoking guns from the Council??

Was this after they stopped the rent?

Just to point out UK has an excellent record when it comes to the use of State aid. as stated on https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31705/12-747-state-aid-frequently-asked-questions.pdf QUOTE: The UK has an excellent record of State Aid compliance and...

QUOTE: Case law is a bit technical but main point so far is Sisu QC says council should have informed EU but didn’t. If this is the case then the CCC have totally messed up.

I don't think the Yorkshire Bank wanted them to settle there debts with them as they are more interested in keeping the mortgage going. The longer they have the mortgage is with them the more they benefit financially. The fact that the Yorkshire Bank was trying to put them off in doing this is...

Give Jamie Gray a medal of achievement. The only CT photographer to capture this woman on film. The Loch ness monster has more photo snaps than this woman. Well done lad!!

So they saying it was all about the stadium and not the football club. SISU you had bought the club and had taken the responsibility to run it and fund it. That's what most football club owners do when they buy a football club? They invest in it. What has this to do with the CCC?? they did...

I believe this was dismissed as it had no relevance in the Higgs and SISU case as the CCC were a third party but it would be of relevance in this case as it involves SISU vs CCC. I maybe wrong but I don't think the judge will dismiss it this time round and keep it in.

Won't put it past them.