Search results

It's definitely not woeful. But £3.5m reportedly on the initial fee, SC Heerenveen sell on will be at least 10%, possibly more, and his wages throughout his time here means there's not really a great deal of profit upon initial purchase. Then again, if we're receiving all of the fee up front...

I suspect that there have probably been enquiries made but they were met with a ridiculously high price tag - and rightly so.

Again it doesn't suggest that, if it's even true. I didn't actually see Saddle's post at the time, but it suggests that as I suspected a lesser fee would only be agreed to if Wolfsberg were willing to pay the transfer in full.

See above. I suspect the package will be around £8m hopefully with add-ons on top. Hypothetically if the agreed fee was £6m, then dependent on what the deal looks like I would hope the majority would be paid up front or would be inclusive of significant add-ons / sell-on.

I've said about Jamie Donley before. Can play CAM and RW. Had a great season for Orient.

I've just given one.

I would've thought this would be the rough figure as well. I'd imagine the only scenario where we take less if the fee wasn't paid in instalments and they agreed to pay it entirely up front.

No, you took GIMOC's post at face value and indicated the sale was indicative of cash flow issues - which there's absolutely zero evidence of.

No, but I think we proactively looked to secure KKH and it was likely understood internally that MVE was off. Him signing on with a new agency was a huge indicator of this. Also, that move was potentially fast tracked as it wouldn't shock me if we got him on a better deal if we bought him...

I think it's been alluded to previously that the club clearly operates on a model of bringing in exciting young talent with a view to developing over a period of a couple of years and if we're not in the PL by then, DK will say we won't stand in their way if they wish to secure a move to a...

Who says the club desperately need to sell to support cashflow? It's all speculative rubbish at this point.

It wouldn't be if SC Heerenveen have a relatively high sell-on clause, which you'd imagine they probably do.

He doesn't have injury issues. One season of injuries hardly turns him into Abou Diaby.

I'd be very surprised if it was as low as £6m. Not sure why we're believing GIMOC all of a sudden. Think about it logically before taking posts at face value. We paid nearly £4m. SC Heerenveen will retain a healthy sell-on fee, and when you include his contract during his time here that will...

Not sure where I said they were on equal footing in terms of demand... Regardless of how inconsistent he is, he's still one of our main sources of goals.

I still think he'd probably angle a move away regardless. He's also 28 in March. Might be the only real opportunity for the club to recoup a decent fee for him.

I'd potentially throw Wright into that mix as well.

£60m is it then

Looks like Ndidi is off to Besiktas.

I was about to say it doesn't really need to be repeated. We just need to stop making life considerably harder for ourselves by starting the season poorly. We already as it stands have a squad and a coaching staff that is more than capable of getting us to the play offs again as long as we...