Search results

Which country? I thought you were on your way to Italy, "spaghetti boy"?

If they were born abroad and both of their parents had foreign or dual nationality, yes, most definitely.

60 years, on and off.

I'm a 'temporary' visitor, I have no intention of living here permanently.

Because you make a point of ignoring any data which does not conform to your narrative. She can live in the UK but if it was up to me I'd deport her back to Germany.

Once again... Living abroad: British residents living in the EU - Office for National Statistics The statistics in this article use a “British citizen” definition to identify long-term residents, as this is considered the most useful in identifying those most likely to be affected by the UK's...

A third of those are 'officially' retired so I imagine they would continue living where they are. I suspect a much larger number are 'unoffically' retired so ditto. The remainder would continue to live and work where they are now provided they meet local employment regulations.

According to Office of National Statistics there are only half that number: Living abroad: British residents living in the EU - Office for National Statistics Main points 784,900 British citizens live in the EU, excluding the UK and Ireland on 1 January 2017. Three countries were very...

I did but I learned a lot more after leaving school than I ever did while I was there.

Yes you have, you just haven't realised it yet. Not for Germany it isn't, just for everyone else.

No, you've put your money on Germany being allowed to continue to run a huge trade surplus at everyone else's expense. Ain't gonna happen.

They are, and it's the reason Trump will win a second term in office and the Republicans probably a third and fourth.

Mandatory deportation if they've come from abroad.

Most of it one-way, with Germany being the biggest offender.

You claim they 'benefitted' by taking minimum wage jobs that you wouldn't do yourself and then wonder why they didn't vote remain.

Would you like to change places with them?

Since the UK paid much more into the fund than it paid back it means the money came 100% from the UK.

It depends whether they consider the cost is worth the benefit I suppose, like every other supposedly 'EU funded' project.

And who do you think the EU got the money from?

The money clearly isn't reaching a majority of people in the area or if it is, then they put other considerations before personal financial benefit. And by the way that money came originally from UK taxpayers, not from the EU.