Search results

So by that definition, every single act of terrorism ever, would be left wing, because it is against "conserving" what exists. Christ, Trump was leading a left wing insurrection all this time. Proud boys, leftie scum. I'm not sure that really stands up. I suspect the problem is an overly...

That's all very fair, but it's not unreasonable to point out that Kirk also promoted the dangerous fiction (amongst others), that the previous election had been stolen, and seemed happy to support an insurrection to overturn it. That is profoundly anti-democratic, and hardly speaks to someone...

Two quick points: There's some reasonable stuff here, but do you understand the difference between socialism and communism? If you're struggling with that (and you are if you think they're the same thing) then your point about Russia doesn't entirely make sense. Secondly, regarding Trump...

A common misunderstanding, oft quoted by those who claim the NHS offers significantly worse value for money than other countries. That many go on to use that 'misunderstanding' to advocate for politicians who favour a privatised, for-profit, NHS, is perhaps worth noting. Below, some detailed...

He LITERALLY said he was ok with it. I guess he wasn't thinking it might be himself or someone that he cared about. Anyway, actual work to do, sorry. I'll leave you to mourn his passing in peace. Don't forget to strongly advocate against violence and hatred in all its forms, be it against...

Literally no one is laughing about it, nonce fanboy. Stop listening to the voices in your head and try reading stuff before commentating. You'll look (slightly) less of an ignorant twat that way. Anyway, isn't it time for your medication. Nurse, he's at it again!

There's polarising and there's the absolutely vain attempt to suggest there's any similarity between what she stood for and what Kirk did. He was ok with people dying to support second amendment rights. School children. He was ok with violence against others in a political cause. I'm not ok...

Funny because I don't remember Jo Cox ever saying that a few deaths (presumably including school children and other innocents) were worth it to retain the rights of every man and his dog to hold lethal weapons. I don't remember her supporting the attempted violent overthrow of a...

He was justifiably arrested, that's the law. You may not like it, but that's the law. Your other question is somewhat without nuance, but if someone posted a credible incitement to violence, then yes, they should be arrested. I don't know how many times I have to say that. What's your...

Again, you're literally making shit up. Can you read without moving your lips? Christ, school was wasted on some people. Look again really, really carefully, and slowly and then come back and quote exactly where I've said the law should be applied differently to different people? Or where I've...

You're an idiot if you read what I wrote and thing that. Read it again. Try harder. All you've confirmed is that you're struggling with comprehension. Show exactly where I've said that the law shouldn't be applied equally. Try actually quoting something rather than just ranting, and it's a...

Again, you're mistaking your opinion for the law. Incitement to violence is against the law. Whether you think the law is correct or not is academic, the police have a duty to enforce it. If I called for someone to be assaulted, and it was a credible threat, then I couldn't complain if I was...

Surely this legitimises NATO, or at least western Europe (Trump obviously being Putin's poodle) providing a more effective air deterrence across Ukraine? In effect, creating a no fly zone over everything east of the front lines could now be justified as self defence for Poland, and would also...

Naah, I've put him on ignore because he's a tedious WUM. I tried, I really did, but in the end it was just too boring to deal with. Pity, because I sensed there was a vague glimmer of intelligence there at least. Ho hum. You're comedy gold though, so you're safe, nonce fanboy. Reading your...

Where have I said anything of the sort? As for nonce, what he's said and done are literally a matter of record, you lunatic. I'm coming to the conclusion that you're just a bit, well, thick and maybe I'm being cruel to you by exposing it on here. Must be terrible for your self-esteem.

Mate, I'm sorry if it hurts, but you are a nonce fanboy, the evidence is quite clear and it isn't going away. What's weird are the contortions you're going through to try to justify it - you'll do yourself an injury mate. As for supporting women's rights, your favourite nonce isn't big on that...

You're literally the fanboy of a nonce who just set back women's rights over their own bodies by decades. The man who also said, "Just grab them by the pussy". Oh, bless, you're too stupid to realise what an absolute hypocrite you are. It's all a bit embarrassing really, you were doing...

Crying and bitching? Hmm. My dear nonce fanboy (I do hope you don't mind me calling you that), literally all you've ever done here is whine. But the 'libs' etc etc. quick somebody, call the Waaah-mbulance.

So in summary, the right wing or perhaps 'Trumpian' position on the law is: I agree with x, so even though he appears to be breaking the law, he shouldn't be arrested. However, I don't agree with y, and he appears to be breaking the law, so I demand his arrest. I think that's about the heart...

I'm quite capable of coming to my own view on it. The only fuckwits blindly following a "Dear Leader" type are the nonce fanboys cheering on Trump. You're also obviously mistaking your opinion for the law. Whatever your opinion on trans women no one has the right to assault them, or to incite...