Search results

Well, yes, which is why I mentioned the figures that Ranson gave, which bore no relation to those actually given in the clubs accounts. The clubs accounts that always showed an enormous amount of debt, for a "debt-free" club too. Figures designed to convince people of the legend of Ranson...

Harry Kewell? HK? Maybe it isn't Hong Kong investement after all.

According to Ranson we were debt free, so shouldn't really have been a problem buying them at the time should it? Of course, "According to Ranson", should be used in the same context as "pinch of salt". Where did you get the analysis of transfer revenues from? Know that the accounts a few...

We really are paying very low wages if that is the case. Based on the performances of a lot our players over the years though, renting a bedsit in a crack house in Wood End should be an aspiration.

Thats because you have no credibility on this forum with your veiw of you must be right regardless of facts which has often been exposed by other contributers on this forum No, I have only used facts, others such as Ginetta, and NLWH, make up "facts" which are I often expose as made up...

Because somebody else pays for you.despite your "principles". I know thers's a lot of competition, but think you speak even more shit than Ginetta, which, to be fair, is probably something to be quite proud of. Well done you.

He did reply when i asked him about this earlier, was something like, "er, well, my friend bought two season tickets, and it was too late not to take it, so I've got to go, and er, um well". Found it a bit far-fetched to be honest. He has a friend??

The facts have all been on here before, the amount paid to Ranson, the huge interest bearing loans paid to Ranson, and previously mentioned myself that Pro-zones figures showed a loss in thie accounts. Some people just didn't want to listen. You were one of them.

How is it backtracking? Cardiff were interested, but not enough to actually pay a decent amount of money for what would amount to a squad player. Still doesn't make him a Premiership player does it? Makes him what he is, a mid to low ranking Championship player, who we've got a lot of money...

The ones with Transformer Lunchboxes and jam sandwiches with the crusts cut off from their mum?

Pretty much what i was saying all along.

Cardiff have been, but not that keen to sign him are they? I said that Barnett's performances for us were awful, Keogh's for us, have been okay, team in the Premiership has, and plays Barnett, no team in the Premiership, or "top-end Championship club", want to sign Keogh, ergo, Barnett, however...

If you could point me to anywhere that i have said "that Keogh could never be the player that Leon Barnett is"? Barnett had 11 games for us I think on loan, not the best, but only a snapshot of what he might do. I'm not saying at all that a player could never be good enough to play in the...

Heretic! Eternal Damnation will be your reward.

Logic is something which is a bit of a mystery to you isn't it? You're good enough for The Prem if you have never played there, been linked with a club who play there, or with a club likely to get there? If you have played in the Prem, or actually play in the Prem then you're not good enough...

Only really remember a couple of good games when he stood out and looked worth the money we spent on him, and went to all the home games that season, and a fair proportion of the away too. Leicester at home was good, in fact don't remember the second of the couple that he was good, so might be...

On the basis that Norwich haven't tried to get Keogh in to replace Barnett then yes. He was awful for us, seeming to do okay for Norwich at a higher level. Bellamy was awful for us, but been a pretty good player everywhere else. Juke was good for us though, so by your logic, Juke is a better...

You can't say that on here, it's like going to the Vatican to have an audience with the Pope, and saying "This God stuff, load of bollocks really isn't it?"

It's called supporting? How are your principles holding up by the way? Still making up, what you always call "facts", about McPakes great(rather didn't happen) 9 match unbeaten run, then being injured and the cause of our 10 match run without a win(despite playing in 5 of them)? Was wondering...

He was good enough to play in the Prem, and did. If being torn a new arsehole by Drogba means you're not qualified to defend at the top level, then there won't be any defenders in the top leagues in Europe. Now, if it had been by Carroll?