Search results

I stand corrected, after reading through the treaty it appears they can be returned to the first safe haven. (As you said)

Not for me, there's nothing worse than celebrating a goal like a teenager loosing his cherry to then have to suddenly stop while play is halted to check and then being so deflated when the goal is disallowed.

Because we remain signatories to it. We may say that we have taken back control of our borders, but the reality is different.

While there is some truth about immigration being seen as the Tories trump card, (their only one) its also not about anyone living next door to a foreigner, that just debases the issue to one of racism, which it is not. We have numerous services that are under funded, NHS, Schools...

But when your employer relies on that government for its continued compulsory licence fee, maybe you should just use a little discretion and keep your gob shut and just continue to pick up your £1million salary. And let's not forget, Mr Lineker wasn't too worried about human rights when he...

Possibly put Sheaf in for Eccles and Maguire for Howley. I think we need the extra experience and the fresh legs for 2 tough away games. I'm just hoping Vik and Hamer dont pick up injuries with the heavy workload.

We should be doing far better from corners, we've got enough height in the side, with 2 big strikers, 3 big centre halves, and 6'+ Howley.

Fadz needed resting with 2 big away games coming up. Also we were 1-0 down when Fadz went off so it was an attack minded sub, I'm sure if we were 1-0 up he'd of stayed on.

Because he's not very good. That's why he's 3rd choice striker. (He's been elevated to 3rd choice now Waghorn has been loaned out and Tavares is injured) Why would anyone want our 3rd choice striker playing when our 1st and 2nd choice strikers are fit and available?

Why?

The BBC's actions have certainly ensured that this issue remains in the headlines. If they had just ignored it (publicly at least) then the whole thing would of been over before it started.

So let me get this straight. Lineker is suspended, for his use of words, in a tweet, criticising a government minister over her use of words. Is that right?

But this scandal has nothing to do with any wrong doing. Thats my point! Lineker may well be a twat, but he's hardly front page material. He's stupid for being openly critical of the government while working for the BBC, at a time when the government is being lobbied to do away with the...

Only if they are getting paid it would seem.

The BBC getting more flak for suspending Gary Lineker over a tweet, than they ever did for the Martin Bashier manipulation of Princess Diana, or for continuing to employ suspected paedophile Jimmy Savile.

Interesting point, the jug eared twat was quite happy to take the money when providing punditry for Qatar, but feels he can lecture the government on morals? Seems a bit like double standards to me.

It certainly won't look good if we fail to pick up 3 points.

Because while they receive that money, they remain sustainable! ....... simples

Only if you want to look like you pissed your only pair of good trousers, and jeans was all you had left.