Search results

wouldnt read much in to precedents etc ...... FL will look at each case on its merits (demerits?) ........ nothing to stop a company changing its articles dont think that would upset the FL in its self. Its more to do with how that change is used and from the info available nothing actually...

Already done Pete .... not expecting a reply

yes sorry SOE my mistake - now corrected thanks gally9 also

the change was made 16/12/11 was not received by Company House until 23/03/13 (should have been there a week after change made) but would seem it was filed by the directors just as the company went in to administration. The purpose of the changes seems a little unclear other than to try prove...

thats what it looks like to me Sub. CCFC Ltd is the football playing club ........ CCFC ltd then is owned by CCFC H. Of course TIm etc seem to see it differently ...... and need to explain why

It seems to me we can be pretty certain that the share is in CCFC Ltd. If it wasnt that company would have been wound up not in administration. The FL have taken the share for safe keeping and wont make a public statement until the administrator makes some decisions. So where is the trade? Mr...

very fair points and i agree..................... wonder if the FL have thought that through ?

so to answer a series of questions with just two what do you think the purpose of all these actions by SISU are? Can ACL fight that off?

purposes of administration Rescuing the company as a going concern. (Note: this purpose is to rescue the company as opposed to rescuing the business undertaken by the company.) - Or, achieving a better result for the company's creditors as a whole than would be likely if the company...

fit and proper is a sham in my opinion.... self certification pretty much. The club and its owners can point to all the good things they have been splashing across the papers etc for community projects, the fact they are funding the club, the fact club has never faltered etc etc My guess is...

possible solution maybe CCFC Ltd who own the golden share in administration..... because of administration the FL take the share away from CCFC Ltd share now seperated from ccfc ltd CCFC ltd come out of administration with ownership in hands of SISU/Arvo FL then say well we have the...

but if SISU take back CCFC Ltd they will own both companies and FL wont give the share to anyone else (PHiV included)

rent strike started april 2012 the heads of terms with charity agreed june 2012

Dont die of shock Godiva but i am inclined to agree with you :)

would agree with much of that ............... not sure the end game is that close though

But if it is that close there are infra structure implications that the council do not have to support Think it will be south side of Coventry myself if at all

These are the coventry city council boundaries http://www.coventry.gov.uk/info/100003/in_my_area/1472/boundary_maps/4

has anyone else spotted that this is an implicit admission by TF ............. If they were putting forward the plan for a new stadium in December then they had no intention of agreeing a rental that would keep the club at the Ricoh. The discussions that took place in January 2013 were at...

Think you are right chiefdave............ the FL i suspect are willing to roll over on this, unless we can put pressure on them eg from politicians over governance of the game

just something to consider TF in his interview this morning "“We made the council fully aware of our intention to build a new stadium last December and it was reported in the media in January." negotiations to agree the rent F&B's etc collapsed 29th January 2013. The point of those...