Search results

Firstly when the original company was split it was done with written approval from the FA and FL. In which case everyone knew where the share and it was in CCFC Ltd. When they got relegated it would have been CCFC Ltd that exchanged the share with I think Fulham as they went up. In 2008 when...

the player contracts were taken out in CCFC H, TF confirmed this in March....... the registrations(at least some) were in CCFC Ltd - there was some registrations listed in the administrators initial report £466k. I suspect new contracts were completed in August 2011 when there was the hoohar...

If you have written to FL and not received a reply within 28 days you can make a formal complaint under there customer charter

questions - How can errors be serious but not break regulations - Does ACL have a claim against the following Appleton, Football League, the FA, SISU, and or personal claims against TF & Seppalla - Does Appleton have the duty to recover assets from Otium, CCFC H - does Appleton have a duty...

so its ok because they have checked everyone else and said sorry to the sports minister ....... :facepalm:

Yes it will but it is not an asset of SISU's ..... they hold their clients money in trust they have no beneficial rights to it in terms of ownership so the figure will not appear on the SISU Capital balance sheet. yes they could have been selective in the info they disclosed - we just dont know

Can only tell you what is in the accounts RPH. The income is down partly to rebates to clients per the directors report and if the extra investment funds came in say March 2013 perhaps the full years fee isnt due. Also the Asset under management is a valuation not necessarily the amount...

you can read les reids twittter....... just google it You just can not contribute to it without signing up

just to humour you Godiva TF said the following Monday "“The club was expecting the council to consider whether it wished to renew discussions on the basis on a transaction, but no response has been received.The club simply needs all the revenue which comes from owning its own stadium" It...

reasonable assumption, assuming that SISU prove it to the auditors satisfaction

Think we are missing the point here SISU act as agents for their investors. The value of the investors money is not going to show up in the SISU Capital Ltd accounts. They may have just shown the Football League the amount they have available to invest from their investors and the authority...

Ownership of ACL is not on the table a long lease might be. Do you really think that is what SISU are after ........ really???? You do not go to all this planning effort and cost to take second offerings :facepalm: Been reading too many fairy tales Godiva? Never implied it was wrong or evil to...

can I ask you to think about that bit ....... does the club need to own the stadium to have access to all its income streams ? Why not buy or earn out those income streams. Who is it that needs to make a capital profit on the stadium? ....... wouldnt be the football club because it would never...

Understand what you are saying Robbo - needs someone to make a move to break the deadlock. You could just as easily rename the letter and send to CCC or perhaps more importantly to rewrite and send to Seppala asking her sell up entirely. Dont see any of it happening any time soon 1) I dont...

the 10 year lease is supposed to be the minimum tenure required under Football League regulations too

unbelievable in so many senses !

the company in administration and to be liquidated was CCFC Ltd. Mr Appleton was very clear that it was CCFC H Ltd that was running the club. Indeed TF was also clear on it. From 22/03/13 the club was being operated by something other than CCFC Ltd and that had been accepted by the Football...

Full interview with Clarke on CWR now after 9 am news

Greg Clarke said that the regulations were not rules but guidance in his CWR interview I believe............. in which case how can they rely on the football creditors rule because it is in his words guidance not a rule Not sure the guy fully understands the implications of some of what he is...

seems much much longer than that ............