Search results

Well they've certainly distressed the debt and the fans.

Sadly I can see them either forgetting to do that, or requested it but not having got approval from the League to do so when they dumped us into Admin. It's the last bit that I've bolded that worries me because as I understand it, the Golden Share = Football Club hence why they are talking to...

The League said this in their statement: That last bit that I've bolded suggests to me that they think the share (and therefore the club) is still with Ltd. If they thought the share wasn't with Ltd why would they be talking about a sustainable future within the league? Although I'm guessing...

So basically either they argue in court that they are linked in which case the 10 point deduction will be confirmed and the appeal null and void. They argue that the companies are separate in court - and this is agreed by the court - in which case we might (no guarantees) win the appeal against...

In a strange way a small part of me is glad that this has come to a head now. To my mind the fact that we could have been and possibly still are fielding a third party ownership team is clearly wrong as pointed out above. If left unchecked there is a remote possibility that the League could have...

And it's a shame that if we are found guilty of breaching them the FL probably wouldn't see that level of incompetence as a reason to fail the fit and property test.

I think you may have sadly summed it up perfectly in that post. The sad thing is I can think of at least one poster on here who will still be defending SISU despite all this.

But the Club is where the Golden Share is so looking likely to not be with the parent company.

The first thing that the Trust would have to do is get Ltd company first unless they are planning on waiting until the restriction on the sale of the charity share. That would be a hell of a long time for the Ltd to be in administration.

That would be my question, if the Ltd isn't for sale as Stuart claimed in his broadcasts what is going to happen to it? Again assuming that the Golden Share is still in Ltd. What's best for CCFC?

So what is the Administrator going to do with our club*, nothing? *Assuming of course that the Golden Share is still in Ltd.

Nice way to libel the the former directors as a final comment. :claping hands:

How are the council greedy?

Oh Bugger it! Come on Sky Blues

How on Gods green earth did they think they were make our debt or indeed the club worth more to the market with their strategy? More recently not paying the rent must have made us seem very attractive to potential buyers. And get it out of our penalty area Sky Blues - come on.

Well technically I'm on holiday as it's a Bank Holiday.

Have SISU/TF ever actually engaged with the fans, a bit like PWKH has done on here - and explained things? It might have softened attitudes towards them a bit, then again it might not.

No I don't believe that they do have hotels casinos etc. at many other grounds however I also don't know what the financial situation at these clubs is. Yes clubs are big sink holes of money and most big money owners only pour money into a club because they support the club and want to see it...

Rob Gurney's back - albeit briefly.

I did think maybe this £24m comment was a remark - and not everybody made remarks - at the end of a meeting made purely as a “goodbye” gesture and not as a sign of any "serious offer". Now where would I have got that idea from....