Search results

It was 26th February 2010 when they filed the accounts for SBS&L, CCFC H & CCFC ltd for the year ended 31/05/09 There are a series of timelines on the Trust website that might help people with the dates and verifiable information http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index.php/timeline

no stupot that info was in the 31/05/12 accounts....... well details were in the SBS&L Group accounts for 2012 ............ but CCFC Ltd and CCFC H haven't filed any 2012 accounts. These are the 2013 accounts we are waiting on

NW IEC is the company that is owned 77% by ACl and 23% by Compass. It is the joint venture company that actually operates the events on the site. ACL is the holding company. The group structure is being or has been changed so that ACL oversees (and receives rents) rather than operates the site...

By the 28th February 2014 the following accounts should be filed Sky Blue Sports & Leisure to 31/05/13 - these group accounts will give some details of the football club activities to 31/05/13 (the only trading part of the group is CCFC). These accounts will detail exactly how much SISU...

no but then again he did contact 87 of the Supporters Trusts to ask them to get their members to sign the petition (post 211 on the official petition thread) :thinking about:

Latest article in the CT fan zone by Jan from the Sky Blue Trust Challenge your MP to help fix football http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/sport-opinion/fans-zone-challenge-your-mp-6730193 Another area where we can all put pressure on.

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/new...t-date-6724949 Confused............ why in a case between the Charity and SISU is it that ACL have to disclose its correspondence with CCC (have those two parties been joined in to the counter action against the Charity by SISU?)......... and where is the...

As I understand it both Supporters Direct and Jan from the Sky Blue Trust will be studio contributors to the programme that starts at 11am

there have not been two JR cases as such .......... the first two hearings were to examine whether there was an arguable case by SISU for there to be a Judicial Review. Does that mean all evidence was presented at the two hearings no but the evidence from SISU's side of things was available for...

Judicial Reviews do not have the power to award damages. That would be done by further and separate litigation. If SISU got an outright victory on the JR I would guess they would make a case for financial damages, loss of trade, damage to the clubs reputation, costs of financing, costs of...

usually it is the Board of directors saying no to a bid ...... they do not welcome it or recommend to shareholders..... that's the bit that makes it hostile. The bidder then goes around buying shares off people to get to tipping points in the process. But that's with Public companies...

I think everyone expects a clear cut verdict one way or another...... I do not think it will be that easy. There may well be a judgement that leaves the door open for whoever "loses" to take further action. That said there will only be appeals if there are grounds for appeal. What could happen...

Wouldn't work because the transaction would have to be approved by the remaining shareholders and I really cant see that 96% approving Trust ownership even if only 4%

No indications of term at all Vick. That may well be their normal mode of operation but not sure this is a very normal case for anyone including SISU. Usually I would guess they come up against organisations that are not quite so willing to fight back (or simply do not have the means...

According to last annual return filed at companies house 07/11/2013 L Brody still owns 548 shares in SBS&L

Could be any of a number of reasons though Jack. It could even simply be a number of the B class shareholders. Pretty certain it is not the Alan Edward Higgs Charity or the Alan Higgs Centre Trust I can not see what they would gain from it. There is no legal action that the AHCT is involved in...

As far as I am aware there is no liquidator been appointed to CCFC H - none listed at Company House anyway, so no reason to think Mr Appleton is involved in striking CCFC H off. Is there something more to this? depends who has objected I would have thought. There are apparently no creditors as...

Is now the liquidator not administrator but no report filed since 8th October 2013. So nothing new other than he disclaimed use of the Ricoh lease and licence 14th January 2014 ie he doesn't want to retain it for his purposes as liquidator - effectively broken it and no longer exists

They could have done this before, the vote and notices to wind up were weeks ago, so I really don't think it is the Charity or ACL objecting. So who has issued the counter claim SISU or Otium or CCFC H or some mixture of all? If the claim was for say TF's time as director of CCFC H then if...

have no idea ....... my best bet would be HMRC but Simon seems to think it is to do with the Higgs Charity vs SISU case. Cant see why or what grounds the Charity or AHCT or ACL would object though so very much doubt they have