Search results

No problems with that so long as it isn't to the club when SISU are still owners.

Haven't you heard they are leaving, Uncle Timmy has said the club is not planning to play at the Ricoh next season. http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-on-ricoh-contingency-805788.aspx Where the Administrator is expecting us to play, (along with who will be playing for TF in...

And I believe as I've said before that the club should eventually own ACL, I just don't think SISU should, ever.

I've said that the I'd support the club being owners of ACL before, I just don't want SISU to own any part of ACL or the Ricoh ever.

As a guess, to improve the Facilities at the Ricoh Arena, such as those mentioned by PWKH e.g. new exhibition halls, a new conference facility, new hotel rooms etc. and on the mortgage.

I hope they don't take any action for him doing that.

Council own the freehold, ACL own the lease, Money made by ACL is ploughed back into the Ricoh and the shareholders of ACL do not take dividends until the mortgage is paid off. Source: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/16830-The-Rent?p=186910&viewfull=1#post186910

To make you happy I guess Doncaster would, although as I say if you've got no money to spend it's a bit academic having the potential to spend it.

That depends, it seems to me that it's useless to be able to spend masses on your squad under FFP if you've not got the money to spend.

Happy Birthday!

Stu Francis - Crackerjack. Classic stuff!

Yes but the naming rights were already included in the losses incurred by the SMC, if you read the council scrutiny document https://www.doncaster.gov.uk/db/chamber/.%5Creports%5C5%20smc%20update.doc it shows that money as being included. So it doesn't matter if they are getting £90k for that...

I'd love to see a successful team and a prospering club, what fan wouldn't? My point is that the statement . is as far as I know incorrect and no one has provided any evidence that Doncaster were threatening to move out, or had fallen out with the council. The Keepmoat management company was...

https://www.doncaster.gov.uk/db/chamber/.%5Creports%5C5%20smc%20update.doc The Keepmoat was not a resounding success as a stadium.

Actually if you read up on the charity it wasn't just set up to help deprived children but stated within the objects is Source:http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends67/0000509367_ac_20110405_e_c.pdf They therefore I am assuming they decided that taking on the club's stake in the...

No but I don't want to stoop to your level. If only that were true.

Well when he asked that If the club could get the stadium for nothing who on earth would object, he obviously couldn't see that a charity and the Coventry Taxpayer would. See for yourself how much the charity cost to run, the accounts are here...

No they wouldn't sell entirely at cost price but nearly plus interest and some of the market value, PWKH spelled out as much as he could here: Source: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/28335-Another-question-for-PKBH?p=398194&viewfull=1#post398194

Do you have a very short memory? Source: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/30568-Mediation-arbitration?p=434359&viewfull=1#post434359 Source: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/30568-Mediation-arbitration?p=434430&viewfull=1#post434430

You have to remember that Grendel doesn't appear to care about the Charity set up to help deprived Coventry children.