Search results

Is it not the same email that was "leaked" to Simon Gilbert? Maybe you should ask him to reveal his source? Though it's strange that it is one sent from ML rather than one sent to ML that is leaked.

Have you worn out your exclamation mark key and having to make do with the question mark one now?

Fuck me, it's Petrocelli!

Think The Beatles had it first mate.

Maybe the whistlers are Mods and thought it was Bank Holiday Monday?

He's great at interior decorating though.

My point exactly, and many seem to be rushing headlong into what Sisu want. Would say it's clever tactics by Sisu, but to be fair it doesn't really take an awful lot to set some people off.

So basically, everybody has fallen into the trap that Sisu have set then if scenario 1) is correct then? Pavlov couldn't do any better.

That is the whole point of Parliamentary Privlilege. If said outside Parliament could be be taken to court for defamation, if said inside Parliament can't be.

That is the whole point of Parliamentary Privlilege. If said outside Parliament could be be taken to court for defamation, if said inside Parliament can't be.

I've been thinking about this post and the leaked email, and there are a couple of possible scenarios: 1) That the OP is somebody from the Sisu side that wants to make Jan and Steve's position untenable within the Trust. Seems strange as they are the only ones that, going back to the SOC days...

They need to look into it, and verify or not, sources, emails etc, well away from here I'd have thought. Once that's done, to everybody's satisfaction then some sort of statement, denying, or confirming accusations would have to be made nbefore paranoia and witch-hunts get up an even bigger...

Depends how much you'd like to be shot down for flying over a restricted area. Think you should go for it myself, 100% behind you!

I'm sure he'll answer all your questions immediately as you've asked so nicely!

Shit idea that.

It's not like you're one of what some what class the "usual suspects" when it comes to complaining about the whistles or whatever, in fact would say that you're broadly sympathetic to their ends. They really don't help themselves, seems far more a "look at me" thing than genuine protest now.

Offered many opinions, on owners, managers, players and the like over the years. Fortunately never had to revisit them and pretend that I never held those views in the first place or thought that I was "misled" like some child who hasn't yet achieved the ability to reason for themselves. Can...

It all looks just a bit too obvious though to me to be genuine.

Owns a whistle?