Search results

Clubs should be forced not to spend more than they bring in, however that goes. To be fair, in our whole history only really gone bust twice, since we've been at the Ricoh, though that not the major reason by any means.

£10million an obviously exaggerated figure, but no club should be "forced" to play in a stadium because there is no other choice in the area, just asking to be held to ransom. That applies everywhere, not just Coventry of course.

I'm more of a paused Sex Machine myself nowadays.

Are you buying the Ricoh and going to charge £10million rent a year? Rumbled, Sherrif Fatman!

Nice to win something!

Still don't understand why the FL are getting so much grief for allowing the club to move out of Coventry though? Basically you're saying that whatever people charge for the rent, whoever the owners are, ACL, Sisu,Otium, PH1V, that as it's the only suitable ground for League Football in...

Who'd want more than one Tony anyway?

At £40 an hour I'd survive it!

Somebosy who's just changed their username temporarily.

Yes, as I said, we were never "debt free".

Think the debt was carried over, we were never "debt free".

Probably weren't paying £40 an hour for cleaners at HR though to be fair. Anybody know how to apply for a cleaning job at the Ricoh?

He'll eat all the fucking food!

Or afford to live in.

The fucking Coleman years as I refer to them.

If we spend more than we bring in then we have overspent, simple as.

He heard that he'd been linked to Coventry on here so got his retirement in quick!

McAnuff always been a good player.

QPR will be a bit fucked if they don't get back up through the play-offs.

Fans complaining about "lack of investment", "speculate to accumulate" etc.(and I've done it myself in the past) are part of the problem in this. Plenty complaining the season that we went down that we weren't spending enough money, but still spent over 100% of turnover on player wages, sure...