Search results

In terms of potential incomings, I initially fancied we would add a couple of quality PL loanees but must admit I'm not even hopeful of that now. With the current climate PL clubs will be reluctant to let their best young players go as they may be needed in the first team. In fact look at...

MR has said repeatedly that he's trying to move Pask, Jobello & Hilßner on, not sure where the notion we're not has come from. We might be able to pay up Jobello (worst case scenario) but with Hilßner he still has 18 months left on his contract, that will be a hefty settlement for us to payout...

Think this will be a pretty moot argument for both teams in all honesty. 2 small squads, Covid & injuries rife it will be a case of picking whoever is available.

The usual clamp down on 2 or 3 idiots by punishing thousands of well intended supporters. Will be a shockingly low crowd I think.

Not in terms of what £ we could offer to both MK Dons & the player.

Yeah, great players but no chance unfortunately. O'Riley in particular will have much bigger suitors. Best player in L1 imo, he'll get a top Championship move & then he's a nailed on future PL player in my eyes.

Agreed again. Was hopeful that it was going to pay homage to the games whilst still being decent... Did neither, utter utter tripe.

Ha ha yes, I would say probably bollocks then but if others are saying the same then could be something in it.

Did you see that twat saying AFTV made Arsenal relevant?

Can play 10 as well as wide. Talented boy, good dribbler. I could see some truth in this if Leeds are willing to let him go.

£7m+ & then add ons on top.

That 13.5k will include the 30% he says didn't turn up too wouldn't it? So actually more like 9,500 in the ground, some of which were only paying £10? Christmas Cracker indeed, they'll be giving the tickets away in them next year.

Was released, he's a free agent.

Brandon Mason on trial with Reading

He'll go to a decent European side, almost certainly Feyenoord I'd imagine. Deal was agreed in the summer but he got injured then.

He doesn't foul him?

It shows the contract as Odegaard on Ederson rather than the other way around?

Interesting. From that there's no touch on the ball by Ederson but no foul either so still the correct decision.

Listen, I hate VAR more than anyone but... The Odegaard one I still think Ederson gets a piece of the ball, at worst it's 50/50 so shouldn't be overturned - Correct decision. Silva one - he's fouled twice, the trip & the shirt pull - Correct decision