Search results

Then why not just give £1k to the club - cut out the middle man?

So, that's a no?

Serious question Torch... If like me you've been a Cov fan as long as you can remember (and that takes me back to the 60's) and you believe that SISU are bad for the club, do you believe that that makes me "anti CCFC" ?

Think you're confusing him with Adam Dent. Rob was/is a true Sky Blue!

Not sure that's true. If "everything" was in administration I'd agree that any interested buyer would come forward. However we're in, what seems increasingly to be, our usual mess. CCFC Ltd is in administration. It probably owns the golden share, but apparently doesn't own any players...

They always do!! Who has lost round 1? Us.

As I recall you've been telling us for years that there would be no interested buyers.

There is something quite impressive in your dogged determination to defend the indefensible.

To be fair, on a pretty depressing day, the "official statement" from TF is the only thing that's made me chuckle :)

I think that just about everyone would agree that trying to negotiate a rent reduction was the right thing to do. For me, the problem was the way they went about it. They started with a strong moral case and a weak legal case, but then massively overplayed their hand and appeared to go out...

I think the point is more that (some) people believe that SISU will not sell the club at a price that anyone would be prepared to pay. Therefore if you believe that the club needs a change of ownership to be able to progress, then sadly administration appears to be the only way forward -...

I'm in London at the moment. I have an 11.00 meeting tomorrow - very tempted to "forget" it and find my way to the court instead. Mind you, it'd probably be a huge anti-climax like most of our big games :(

I think that everyone from every viewpoint on this site seems to agree that for a successful future for the club it's vital that the club owns the stadium. On that basis, wouldn't it be odd if potential buyers of the club weren't trying to establish what sort of deal might be available for...

To be fair, he only said "one of the best" :)

There are also many valid points which shouldn't be dismissed because of other posts. Too easy and too cheap. Generally I'd agree that he does OK, that's why I was surprised by his tone yesterday.

That's odd, I was reading a thread critiquing one bloke for doing a poor job. Where was this stuff about a BBC conspiracy, it sounds fascinating? Oh, and is he really a lizard? Was David Icke right after all?

Time of the month?

To be honest, I have no idea if that's true or not. If it is true, then I'd say it's a bit shabby. I'd also say it should be viewed in context against the past financial support and the (I assume) free hours that he's put into the club over the years.

If he was being blatantly anti-SISU then no doubt those who support SISU would be the ones complaining. As someone once said - that's life, stop crying about it etc etc :)

My concern was the lack of balance -this is the BBC after all. SL was highly concerned over ACL's reasoning for their court case but seemed completely unconcerned with the many ( and some would say more significant) questions that SISU had not answered. So happy for people to disagree, no...