Search results

Reckon so. If I understand it correctly, acceptance of the CVA would involve the acceptance of a small sum for the termination of the lease. If they were going to accept termination of the lease, I'd assume that they wouldn't be taking this action against Northampton. So, if all of that...

Agreed - I'd been wondering when this avenue would start to be explored.

OK - we're aware that your default position is to snipe. That's your choice. I had thought that you were against the move to Northampton. This is, in my view, potentially very helpful to the fight to stop that move. Can you honestly only find negative things to say about it?

Interesting isn't it! I wonder if this means that ACL are not accepting the "split" between Ltd and Holdings, i.e. that only the Ricoh contract is in Ltd and the "football club" is in Holdings. I can't say I've thought this through from a legal perspective, but perhaps their argument will be...

OK - let's spell it out then. The FL "reluctantly" agreed the move to Northampton because "there was no possibility of Coventry playing in Coventry". When I spoke to them earlier this week, I asked them how they had reached this conclusion. They said that SISU (well, Otium to be precise) had...

Do you really want yet another explanation of how this administration was loaded in SISU's favour with the supposed £70m of inter-group debt? There are bacterial life forms on the Planet Zog that have grasped that one by now!

I agree that we can't be absolutely sure without the written evidence, although in my view we can be sure in a "beyond reasonable doubt way". Whilst I can't claim total recall, I don't think that the history of the first three years contradicts the plans set out by SISU when they arrived.

Sorry - I have to disagree with you on all points. In this scenario it's nonsense to count SISU and Ranson as one and the same. PE houses often work with "entrepreneurs" that they think understand a market/industry - the fact that they make a joint approach to then purchase a company, would...

I have to admire Godiva's persistence in following this line of argument. For (please, please, please) the last time - the number of Directors on the Board is not necessarily the deciding factor in control. In my experience of working with Private Equity, the PE house will have control by way...

I think he's gone on holiday........

We have the power to starve them out. NOPM.

How is that giving away revenue, if moving to Northampton isn't??? Come on, you've got to try a bit harder than that....

More lies from Fisher - "having a heart"???

No one should threaten his family. Firstly because it's wrong and secondly because living with him, they must already have suffered more than enough!

Bumpety bump.

Which is why we need to do everything we can to fight the b@stards!

I think the only minor problem is that whilst "SISU seem satisfied enough with their arrangements", these "arrangements" are going to leave us playing in front of tiny crowds (remember when revenues for FFP used to be important to SISU) for the foreseeable future, while our fan base diminishes...

Surely the relevant question is: next season under FFP would the club be better off in a 7,000 capacity stadium or the Ricoh?

Just for a giggle - could you please explain how you reach your valuation of £100m for a business that is losing money, has virtually no assets and is in the middle of destroying its customer base. Please.