Search results

I look forward to the day Andrew gets to answer for his crimes in court. Unfortunately in the court of social media it's almost impossible to hold one point of view without some idiot coming out and saying you are 100% pro or anti that issue. This being a typical example, I've said it's...

Your clueless.

You might be the kind of low life scumbag who thinks it's OK to scream and shout obscenities at a funeral, but I don't. So if that puts me in a different boat to you, then trust me, I'm more than happy.

Showing such disregard and disrespect for the Queen's funeral. (Not for upsetting Andrew, he's just a nonce)

You clearly have no argument left.

Well go and protest outside a mosque against Islam, or Muhammad or shariah law, and see how you get on. I mean who would kill someone over protesting about a long dead prophet? Try being a Jew in London just going about your legal daily business when there's a pro Palestine march going on...

I don't know. I wasn't there, you'd need to ask the met police chief who I'd imagine gave the instruction to move them on.

Probably someone in the crowd knocking the twats teeth out.

It's not censorship if the police decides your action is likely to endanger life or property. The protesters at the coronation (for example) could of walked the few hundred yards to Hyde park, and protested quite lawfully. Without the fear/risk of causing a disturbance.

That depends on your definition of "peaceful" I'm sure you will find the local police chief will make that call, as he's the one held responsible if things go T.U. In London last year the public were outraged at the disruption caused by "just stop oil" And there were a number of complaints...

There's a huge difference between protesting peacefully, and doing so in a place that's directly going to cause a breach of the peace. For example, that lad who shouted abuse at Prince Andrew during the Queens funeral procession, he was very quickly silenced and ejected, and quite rightly...

I blame Trump!

That rat manager is quite happy with the result.

Here is that engineer

What did he make it out of?

Argh yes, but no one wants to remember that or point it out, it doesn't fit with the "blame Trump for all the worlds woes" agenda.

The addition of Grimes meant that there was only 2 other available places in midfield, so someone was always going to get reduced minutes. And as Grimes has been used as a defencive midfielder, Eccles was the one under most threat, and one of the players who needed a rest (along with MvE)...

I think a 10 point deduction is quite appropriate.

A lot of the problem is that the football authority is toothless when it comes to enforcing the ffp rules. Man City have taken the piss for years, but nothing happens, Everton did the same but just got a meaningless points deduction Automatic relegation should be the appropriate action plus...

It was fuck all