Search results

Did they announce by accident and they have actually signed someone else?

Ipswich also showing it as 6pm on their announcement article too https://www.itfc.co.uk/news/2025/july/29/Ipswich-Town-Championship-fixtures-Sky-Sports/

Not at all but id rather have the luxury of having a replacement in the squad before we sell him

Always better to have the replacement before they leave. Kesler-Hayden being a perfect example

Correct. No player in the whole championship scored 20 league goals last season

Still think they will colour code the different age cards when it's scanned. Easier to spot those taking the piss

As you asked no. You however solely intended just to have another dig at king with no factual basis to back it up.

We get it you don't like him. But he has yet to do anything to validate that opinion. In fact he has probably spent more on transfers than we have made to date.

He wont go there but it would make sense. Ipswich are clear favourites in my eyes to go up.

Yes until Forest put a protest in

Competing with this:

The offical transfer document that Sporting have to legally disclose showed we will get 3.75 million. Noted that is euros so about 3.25mil in total

It isnt its orange.

It strikes me as he is trying to make it more valuable but also then claim we have a significant investment in it and wants a fair price to purchase it outright

You totally missed my point i see. No team in the whole division had a 20 goal scorer last season. Do you honestly think any player loaned from the premier league scores 20 goals in a season? Delusional

In theory amazing. But where do we find this striker within our price range. Just for comparison a grand total of 0 players in the whole championship scored 20 goals last season.......

And the away kit is announced!

In which case we wont be using any option even if it exists

So are you advocating paying more than that then even if we do have an option? Ive read from multiple journalists that its a straight loan so im inclined to beleive them.