Search results

Again I think the point is correct the sentences are incomparable for the action but that doesn’t take into account what was happening or what Lucy Connolly was advised to plead guilty too on a Facebook group someone said they’d read that 30000 current prisoners were guilty of social media...

Truth

That’s true and I think right Which surprises me again what the appeal was and on what ground was it refused

He was not that would be a huge over reach I have no problem with the government doing all in its power to bring the rioting to swift conclusion but the judiciary are a-political

Nothing to do with starmer it’s a Tory givebrment set of legislation I have great trouble someone being imprisoned for what is said but this has to have boundaries Fundamentally though you’d hope a good solicitor would be able to show that there was no incitement behind the words however...

What I don’t understand is what has two tier justice or starmer making his speech on far right hate speech got to do with someone pleading guilty to inciting racial hatred Why aren’t they picking on the solicitor who gave such shocking advice?

False equivalence they haven’t admitted inciting racial hatred

Couldn’t give a toss

Fair point This is very different though

Malc my friend life is to be lived and enjoyed

Fatso he won’t be released

10 addee

Wright 35 in 70 or so You’re having a laugh

Not more but mve and grimes were very good consistently

Eccles played the role very differently against Sunderland and sheaf had a good game

Might make the step up if he can stay imjurybfree too

That makes absolute sense thank you

That’s no help and I know I’m being thick

I know I’m being silly Can someone explain to me why the following is the case Same company - same interest rates Fixed rate 2 years but overall mortgage over 8 Fixed rate 2 years but overall mortgage over 10 Why does the monthly figure differ so much? As I say sorry to be thick

Someone should have cut it out and kitchen should have marked his man