Search results

This now has to happen.

ChatGPT to the rescue! “We’ve bought our own Arena, Sky Blue boys! (clap clap) We’ve bought our own Arena, Sky Blue boys! (clap clap) No more rent to pay, the Sky Blues here to stay, We’ve bought our own Arena, Sky Blue boys!” (clap clap)

Nah, he’s better than you’re claiming there.

He’d be a starting CB by, say, November. All depends how much time Lampard wants to spend bedding him in. Could quite easily go straight in.

I’d like to see Doyle at LB which gives us the ability to vary that back 3 in possession. Sometimes Grimes could stay higher and Doyle could shunt across; other times Doyle steps into midfield when Grimes drops deep.

Should have been disallowed, Tom Brady had called a time out.

Sister?

I have this thought that we get both, Doyle becoming our starting LB but cover for LCB behind Kitching. Can never have too many left backs!!

Equally, due to their playing style I don’t think we got to see his capability on the ball.

One of my issues with this style of play. You basically make 5 stand up front which results in little to no space to play. Playing quicker will bring more depth to the play and get them more involved.

Luke Plange. He is shite.

Little to no merit in “strengthening the balance sheet” given the circumstances. The funds were lent interest-free so there is no interest deduction on the P&L to account for (thereby meaning no impact on PSR) and we’re nowhere near flying close enough to the sun for any debt management plan...

Because there is literally no logic applied to zero immigration and increasing the personal tax allowance. Well, there is…looting.

I can think of 3: Michael, Callum and Colin. Any more?

Fairly sure it’s Nagasaki

15 points minimum.

Sorry. https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6893b0178b708191b881c1f3624a14cb Edit: oh shit, even ChatGPT suggests more immigrants.

Hughes signs to play RCB, Doyle comes in as (another) LB. We win every game without conceding.

Based on what exactly?