Search results

Not quite. Grendel posts plenty over here, don’t agree with him on much. Some of what MMB writes has me scratching my head. Must be a different reason…..

Just me that thinks Off Topic has become virtually unreadable over the last 4-6 weeks? (awaits joke that it happened years ago)

For reference, I’m sure Palmer would be capable of that as well.

Hopefully it’s somewhere in Barcelona.

Are we really suggesting that because Harry Kane took it half a yard further wide, which would have left him 1v1 from the corner of the area with all the time in the world, that it’s not a goal scoring opportunity?

Ok, whatever. That is though.

Cracking goal. Probably should be marking Kane though. Heard he’s quite a good goalscorer.

Agree. They’ve absolutely shat the bed. Someone should tell them that polls 42 months from a GE don’t really matter a great deal. I’ve said before, they feel like they’re still in campaign mode rather than governing mode. Edit: 42 months, not 30.

Ok I’ve misunderstood. I thought he was planning to go on podcasts; didn’t realise he had a podcast.

….but good tv, no?

Fair. Are there any UK-based podcasts that you would suggest are ‘good’ targets? I’m not aware of a Rogan-equivalent (not that I listen to that, to be honest). So could it be that the UK podcast landscape doesn’t have the same reach/impact?

Doug just walking round the changing room calling everyone cucks.

I’m genuinely curious on this - that was Trump’s (successful) strategy for his presidential campaign. Why are we to assume that it wouldn’t be the case here? I appreciate the ‘party standing’ angle is different but the method of campaigning surely either works or it doesn’t?

“Outstanding” is an absolutely bonkers take.

Seems there is a fascination with wingers who completely slow the play down. Rashford was doing the same.

It’s fine though, he wasn’t being facetious with that prior comment.

Doug’s got his hands full at the moment.

Looking solely at the financial markets position, I genuinely don’t see where the government can go. If they cut welfare spending significantly they get the political pressure of acting against their members’ (and many MPs’) beliefs. If they raise main taxes they break a manifesto pledge. If...

That is tragic. You’ve abandoned your centrist beliefs to become right wing because of others’ thoughts. Have more confidence in what you believe.

So you believe Shoosmiths are complicit in this swindle? All of the strange bluster seems to be about the valuation being on the IHT threshold, but I’m struggling to see what relevance that has to anything.