Search results

Well I'm sorry to break this to people, but whatever has been said on here will have had absolutely no affect on this decision. Lampards decided let him go, that's all there is to it. 'Scapegoated' on here or not, it won't have had any bearing on the real world.

No one on here let him go mate, it was Lampard. Don't you agree with him?

Hed probably be too busy to sign it after he's patented his cure for cancer.

Good luck to him. Think he needs to move on from us now and hopefully this is the first step. Needs to be playing 1st team football

Several people have commented on Kitching looking trimmer. Lampard doing a good job in my opinion. Though whether we can make a serious play off charge this season time will tell but I'm not expecting it, if it happens, bonus.

Great film!

I'm not sure what Austin has to do with it. If Lampard succeeds, which hopefully he does, he'll move on and take his Coa hing team with him. We'll need a whole new coaching team. Like I say, not overly bothered.

I thought this. This set up clearly isn't designed with continuity in mind and when Lampard goes, then his team will be going with him Personally, like you, I'm not bothered. As far as Im concerned his job is to win matches, not lay the foundations for a seamless transition when he fucks off

Or that he just listens to the manager, which this suggests is happening.

Watched the last 3 warm ups and he has looked to be a bit of a spare part to be honest. Jones seems to be the main man, but as I say, only watched 3.

Yeah, think you're right.

Good point. Just looked it up, don't think he gas operated with just those 2 before, not sure why I thought he had.

Nice one.

Why do people think he'll be replaced? Hasnt Lampard had a team of just Jones and Edwards before?

I'm convinced, based on what I've heard and DMs received that Carr was not a Robins appointment. Not going to get in to the argument over that again if people don't believe it fair enough but it's a really good sign if so. It show Lampard is putting his mark on every part of the club and that...

Re: your last paragraph, that's exactly what I'd argue. Prior to that the team was very static.

Yeah, credit where its due. Even if its funded/part funded by a departure (BTA), its looks just the type of signing we've been crying out for.

I thought there was,a player there but his work rate out of possession was poor. I'm sure he learnt lessons that have helped him develop to where he is today.

I've said this before on here but not all loans require a fee. Some parent clubs pick up the bill but there are caveats, such as they have to play otherwise the club theyre loaned to pay their wages. McFadzean touched on this in his interview with Skyblue TV last week.

Your theory has no more weight of evidence behind it than mine. I've said I could be wrong, but nothing you've said has dissuaded me so I'll leave it there