Search results

I'm not suggesting for one minute that you have chosen to spread misinformation but that is what is happening. Jonathan Strange is a member of the SCG not SISU. SISU, as far as I am aware, do not have an issue with Jan. Their issue is with John Fletcher (I have no idea why) and this is well...

Who mentioned Jan? Read my post again. The main member of the trust board that SISU have the most issue with has never been any part of SOC and was a member of the trust board well before the "revived" trust.

The problem with your post Brighton sky blue is that the main member of the trust board that SISU have the main issue with has been on the trust board for a number of years prior to the "revived" trust and has never been a part of the "save our city" campaign so your point falls on it backside...

I've only done the hill 3 or 4 times I think, the second time we had a chat if I remember right. If others turned up then yes I would. I've enjoyed every time on the hill, it's a good laugh meeting up and chatting with friends. (I've also snuck off to maccy d's on more than one occasion )

If that's what happened then it was wrong. Plain and simple. Regardless of how we feel as fans absolutely nothing can excuse any sort of intimidation or violence towards anyone from SISU.

Think she used to do Sky Blues Talk

Worked out that way for a number of years many years ago, had a few corporate days there, nice little ground that can be extended on. Make a nice little ground for a local team.

Yep, near on nine years, got a few interviews lined up so not worrying too much yet

Yeah ok, but I was in my twilight years, even back then, and no one told me about the rule change of not being about to pick up the ball on a back pass!

Yeah I'm good Steve, not been about too much recently, getting made redundant in a couple of weeks so been job hunting and stuff. Just remembered, you went through the same thing a few years ago!

Yep, it certainly is :)

I hung up my boots after that game, I burnt myself out in practise. That and the fact that when the pictures went out on the Leicester website it became apparent that I was actually wearing my shorts back to front :(

That'll be me :)

Then ask telegraph where they got the e mail from ;)

Just one point Shmmeee, I don't have John as a left winger, he's way too sensible for that. Me on the other hand... :) Joking aside, absolute level headed guy who brings something to any party. Not sure what SISU's gripe is with him, maybe we'll learn one day but whatever the reason I would put...

It's not the same Peter Chambers. I've spoken with Pete on the subject, he tells a funny story of how a friend visited the museum and remarked as he left, "I think you're wrong about sixfields" Pete felt compelled to run after him and explain that he wasn't the same Peter Chambers who writes...

Haha it's pnethor :) still reeling em in after all these years. Good on ya!

You're probably right, they're just business decisions made by a spiteful bullying hedge fund...

:) they shouldn't have bothered on my account. I guess letting Arsenal have them back took away any risk but still meant they would get their £ %. Odd to blame the social media for that decision tho

So what would you call it? Do you believe the reasons stated at the SCG?