Search results

But Fisher said at the forums last year that the facilities they were developing at Warwick University were much better than the Higgs Centre?

How did they conclude that if they hadn't completed their due dilligence?

No it wasn't, but the SISU QC was obviously getting desperate!

He wasn't asked because it's obviously irrelevant to the claim for the £29k that SISU should have paid!

Still looking for your strength RFC or are you are you simply as weak-minded as you appear?

Then can we still bang on about the rent-free offer made for this season!? We also know that they were offered £150k for next season so why are you making up these ridiculous figures? You are making absurd statement "..we can assume it would still have been £1.2-£1.3m in the...

Betcha that doesn't happen. He'll say he was misunderstood or was misquoted!

SISU were the council's "preferred bidder for the club"? What are you on about? Please explain.

This site never belonged to the council. It was purchased by developers who have been dithering about exactly how they are going to do with it!

They could offer to purchase the catering rights instead of paying out £20m+ to build a stadium that nobody wants to go to!

ML has since told the SBT and CWR that he was "mis-quoted" on the 3 week prediction. This is despite the fact that the CT journalist has subsequently confirmed that he did, in fact say, according to his shorthand notes, the following: He said: “We are about three weeks away from being able to...

Is that just for a stadium or does it include a hotel and casino and several acres of development land?

Did you post this on the wrong thread by mistake!?

Thank you for confirming that Simon, although it comes as no surprise to me - and many others, I suspect?

This is what ML apparently told the CT two weeks ago: He said: “We are about three weeks away from being able to name the final site. We are down to two sites and hopefully, within a month, two will be down to one." Looks like a categoric and unambiguous statement you would think? Well...

Yes, but SISUE want the development land as well and they would have to pay full value for the catering. (Would be a lot less than building a tin pot stadium though?)

"Dispelled"? Substantially outweighed I think?

Of course it would work but they firstly have to admit defeat on Plan A and they won't do that until after the JR goes against them.

Then why have they not taken up the rent-free but choose to continue with the ridiculous new stadium route?

Plan A (or is it really Plan B?) is to build a new tin-pot stadium outside Coventry at a cost of £20m+. The interest on the borrowings at a modest 5% (if they're lucky with such a high risk venture and their track record) will be £1m p.a. If it's a 20 year loan, for example, then there is also...