Search results

No because millwall were given permission we werent. The rules are the parent club decide if a LOAN player can play against them. As chaplin was on LOAN they chose this option. At which point are you goung to accept this?

As many know I am one of his biggest critics but even I accept today he played well

The last 7 away games are the real test. 6 of the current top 7 and Accrington. Also to go to Rochdale where our record is woeful.

Wycombe fan telling us they play far better without him

So had we done the same with mcnulty for example you would be happy for us to allow him to play against us? We havent been shafted because we knew the rules when we signed him.

We announced we were going to ve signing him permanently in January. Therefore still a loan til then. Jesus can people not grasp basic understanding on here.

When did Robins say he was signing as a first team player? Sure he said he was a player to start in the under 23s

He is hardly going to come out and say he isn't arsed about the signing is he?

Await the posts saying here we are a much bigger club and ignoring the fact they want paying.

Incorrect. Any loan done outside the window was loan with commitment to buy not option to buy

He can only be a poor tackler if he attempts to tackle

Thanks conor

Chaplin cant go back. He is signed permanently. Amazed people still dont know this

Already turned down bids of 250k from championship sides for shankland

But isnt grimmer better than him....

Not really. Any footballer knows you get good and bad. If they get affected by the bad then they are in trouble

They are happy to lap up praise on twitter etc so should be prepared to accept criticism too. Sorry but i dont buy your argument at all

Customers often ring to complain about the job people do. Its life. If someone is shit at their job customers will tell them. Being a young footballer makes zero difference

Doyle is injured. Ogogo possibly negotiating a january move