Search results

Im pretty sure it can't go to the ECJ for the same reason cited in your post. What SISU could conjure up to fuel another round of court action im not sure, I wouldn't be surprised to see them find something though.

Depends on how far it can realistically be developed imho. If it turns out that 12,000 is the maximum capacity there then we'd basically be setting ourselves sup as a League 1/Championship yo-yo team. Clearly there's the benefit that we could potentially own the place (or a share of it) but i'd...

And Joy will tell him where to shove it.

It wouldn't be on those general terms no. Whether there could be caveats added to make it clear that they only agreed to waive their rights on pre-agreed topics (and subject to 'new evidence' coming to light) i'm not so sure.

Quite possibly, depends on the scope and whether it has an impact on Wasps I suppose (because if it did then you'd assume they would not be able to bring it without breaking any deal made with Wasps). In theory though I see no reason SISU can't agree a tenancy with Wasps and then go after CCC on...

I wonder what, in the secrecy of his own office, Dave Boddy's reaction would have been to this?

Definitely! I wouldn't be surprised if they launched a civil action but equally I wouldn't say it was a certainty. If they don't then presumably there is very, very little to stop at least a short-term deal being agreed at the Ricoh. Of course if SISU are no longer hitting CCC with legal cases...

It does but Wasps would presumably demand an undertaking for SISU to desist with any future cases related to their ownership of the Ricoh....which they might just refuse to give.

I actually don't think they can appeal to the ECJ, it would be for the Supreme Court to refer the matter to them if they felt it was required. Assuming that the SC does not refer anything then I think SISU would be out of chances to appeal and would be looking at a civil action or nothing.

They may be able to appeal to the European Court but even if not i'd think they could launch a civil case if they think they have grounds to.

What a brilliant game. At times we looked unstoppable going forward. Hopefully we can string a good run together to see the season out before we plunge into the unknown. Burge - 5 Another error. Sterling - 6 Hyam - 7 Did very well at times but then poorly at others. I really didn't enjoy his 2...

Probably didn't even pay for her ticket.

I think Joy told us about being really emotional after the Checkatrade victory. 1 every 12 years or so isn't bad surely??

When are the naming rights up? Surely that is soon?

No idea tbh but it will be important whatever they decide to do, could have a major impact on any relationship they want with the fans.

Maybe. It would be difficult to know for sure but more ticket, merchandise and food sales would go some way to offsetting the costs yeah.

Especially not one with a penchant for an early doors 'reducer'!

Get Tim Fisher to stand, that would rattle a few cages!

To be honest id probably forgive them not doing so if there was some decent dialogue with the fans to explain what the money had gone towards instead. The lacks of comms from them in the past has been a large part of the toxic relationship. I very much agree that an offer to help with costs...