Search results

Lati can cover

When you woke up with "Lamps"?

But in better nick?

Not that it matters now, but I wonder whether Carr was ever considered for the role that Robins was dismissed for failing to fill? Weren't the players rumoured to have complained that the standard of coaching had dropped? Yet here we are with people praising Carrs's ability to get a tune out of...

If keepers got booked more often for time wasting, the bookies' odds would simply change to reflect that.

How much is Udogie in the window? 🐶

Yep. The siilest thing is the way the result influences the individual ratings. If Thomas had hit the post instead of scoring the equaliser, every single player's rating would have dropped by a couple of points, without there being any difference in their performance.

Where's this idea come from that the dark arts are on the increase and everyone's doing it so we need to join in? This kind of stuff was way more prevalent in the past, and thankfully you see less of it now with cameras everywhere etc. Quite amusing i guess to see Bassette get the guy sent off...

Surely it was different configurations in and out of possession.

That's all fine, but I'm not 'you guys' and I've never said a single word about Lampard's achievements. That's a problem on here - chucking people onto perceived opposing camps. I think Robins should still be here but I also think the gamble of bringing Frank in stands a chance of paying off.

That's true, but nobody who's had groundbreaking achievements was ever likely to take the job.

This is it. He keeps coming back for more when I imagine he doesn't really need to financially. Maybe it's like riding a bike, and after a few spills he'll learn how to balance and there'll be no stopping him 🤷‍♂️

I increasingly suspect that you're not keen on Frank.

I was waiting for that :)

Fair enough, that's a perfectly understandable view. Like I said, I think there should be some permanent recognition, it's only a question of what form it takes. Have other clubs got multiple statues (genuine question)?

I have already said I don't think a statue of Robins is appropriate. You then chucked in Sillett, who I hadn't mentioned, and now you are back on Robins again I presume? I don't think I even disagree with you or Nick about any of this. What bugs me is people getting labelled as 'weird' and/or...

Crikey you pretend not to get my point when I accurately quote you in my response to you. Then choose to answer it by picking up my response to Grendel who had thrown in one of his red herrings.

But did a minority of fans keep calling for his head, and then support erecting a statue for him?

Fair enough, I get that and agree. But you call people weird all the time, then say you aren't against a statue of the bloke you called for to be sacked?

Robins Nest