Search results

He has intimated that there has been some movement on the rent. IE City paying for the new pitch and then paying reduced rental as an offset. Think they may have done it to try and calm the bond holder situation down due to the ongoing fiscal speculation.

Wasps are a separate company from the bond holder company which own the stadium. If we had the money to pay for a lay and play the administrator would surely have to let us play as would a new owner as any prospective purchaser would see us a sitting tenant. Wasps would be the ones with the...

Interesting reading. https://www.rugbypass.com/news/how-wasps-lost-the-battle-for-coventrys-hearts-and-minds/

I dont think any funding from the WMCA should be given to wasps for a pitch. Surely the grants are designed to help with projects that improve peoples lives not help badly run businesses stay afloat. How does the funding of a pitch in Coventry help the public in Walsall for instance? If the...

So an agronomist has said there is no root structure basically so the pitch wont hold together, A new pitch is £450,000 lay and play as Spurs have just put down, we have offered to pay towards the costs and they have refused. I don't think the egg chasers are going to have a) Have a legal leg to...

Apparently Boddy has triggered the mediation clause in the lease and Andy Street will be mediating between the 2 partys.

This thread is fucking nuts. The Queen could be Chief exec but if the landlord hasn't got a pot to piss in to pay for anything what could she do? Their old stadium anouncer via twitter said don't trust them with season ticket money FFS, they couldn't afford a grow bag at the minute.

Bond holders think there may be some financial foul play in the background. This was posted last night...

The bond holders are looking to get the trustees to call the loan according to the latest. They believe they have the legal president to force Wasps into liquidation and for a sale of the stadium to recoup the non repayment of bonds. They believe that the trustee has first charge over the...

Lots of unhappy bond holders on some of the finance forums. Some of the investors believe they are already insolvent, Wasps Holdings that is. They think they will be lucky to get 20p in the pound back for the bond if that's correct. In light of the in action of any substantial information...

Twitter is doing it's thing

Assets that you may control can make you appear wealthy when your not, not to say our Joy ain't comfortable. Best way to think of it is a pensioners owns there home with a value of 300 000 but only gets cash of state pension at £260 every 2 weeks, it's a non story.

Think it's time to move on from the Ricoh. Wasps for various reasons don't want us there, Rugby Union has always looked down it's nose at the working man's game. If CCC have said they will do all they can to help the club play in the City, Sisu need to put it to the test.

I know but it shows how Coventrians vote!

CCC is full of people that are trying to do there best but like all public bodies 30% of the workforce swing the lead. 80% are under paid and grossly over worked, management scared to manage people out so just let it drift. Some good councilor's but certain individuals are there to further there...

The Trust is not fit for purpose. It's top table have only ever represented party's other than the club. It has never held all party's involved equally to account.

If the new Liverpool kit is anything to go on Hummel don't have anything to worry about.

If the 3.8 million assigned to the Ricoh is for the benefit of the city can they place on record how and also the names of the local companies that are going to be involved.

Then they should have offered Sisu a buy in based on 50% of what they paid. They wanted the whole lot and if it ends up being financially ruinous then so be it.

Monday's Telegraph headline Body's swerve rucked Wasps right up!