Search results

That is a question not an answer. Where is your analysis? That is if you have even read that JHW article, certainly took me well over an hour to get through it

I don't think an idiot could put together an article like that, if you think you can do something that is as comprehensive yet more accurate and illuminating then maybe you could share your considered thoughts with this forum. Even a few paragraphs which illustrate how the JHW article is in some...

I'm having a beer after finding all the shit on this thread.

Which threads?

You have proof so you say, so name names. I don't analyse usage patterns, lol.

So what accounts are you talking about?

I think you'd better have proof to make accusations, personally I have no idea.

So now you are saying there is a conspiracy with 'fake' accounts being used to push it. Earlier on you said it was a 'common theme', whatever that is supposed to mean. Honestly you are sounding like one of the tin foil hat brigade.

Good luck with that.

If SISU dropped the legal action and Wasps did not negotiate that would certainly be unacceptable to me.

SISU own the club it is up to them and them alone to find a solution. Instead they launch litigation against the very parties that you say we should pressure, I think SISU have done the pressure bit for themselves.

You appear to be saying I am trying to see CCFC don't have a home next year, but I've said repeatedly that SISU have to drop the litigation and negotiate with Wasps. I do not believe Wasps will negotiate without that happening, they've said so and I believe it is a genuine intention. You seem...

What common theme, do you believe there is coordination?

Are you saying there is a conspiracy of some sort afoot?

Are you accusing me or any other of these listed parties of being in the pay of anyone to achieve regime change at CCFC or its demise or its replacement with Cov Utd?

You tell me. Still waiting.

You are the one struggling to make a decent fist of arguing your corner. I have made my thoughts clear in this thread but you can't seem find a way to do anything but make sweeping and unsubstantiated claims or accusations about me playing dumb or not failing to follow the argument.

You are the one saying there are omisssions. It is up to you to explain your reasoning not me. I already said the JHW article was a comprehensive and factual description pf events and so have several others.

Tell me what these crucial game changing omissions are?

You can't lay your hands on one fact to substantiate anything you say. You can't win this argument without facts.